6 ms·

This is actually quite good. Around slide 100, he started bringing in some very interesting numbers. Among them: - using facial recognition, they determined

This is actually quite good. Around slide 100, he started bringing in some very interesting numbers. Among them: - using facial recognition, they determined the average number of unique people in your Facebook photos is 6.6, against an average friend count of 130. - 80% of Skype calls are made to 2 friends He makes a very strong point about caring about these "strong tie" relationships, both from the point of view of the user, and of Google (the company making use of the relationships you cultivate). This has implications for how you analyze Plus's success. If Plus ends up with a couple hundred million users, but an average friend count of 30 or so, I suspect Google will be just as happy, or happier, than if they achieved Facebook's level of friend count.

loumf 15y ago
From a business point of view, what Google will care about is pageviews and pageviews/user (because that determines the #of ads they can show). It may be that having fewer friends makes you update more and check more often (because it's more relevant). Or it may be that having more friends causes you to check back. Another metric that drives revenue is how long you stay an active member -- that also might be better the more intimate your relationships are.
- tbh2347 15y ago
  People have to stop saying this. Google isn't so blind as to think every product's sole purpose is to drive pageviews. I'm speculating just as much as you are, but I don't think it's unreasonable to guess that a big part of Google+ is to drive usage of its other products. Once people start sharing directions, collaborating on documents, and so on G+ will be there to introduce users to one product after another. Sure, social ads may/will be important, but saying "what Google will care about is pageviews" is simplifying it immensely.
  - loumf 15y ago
    That's why I prefaced it with "from a business point of view" -- to imply that it isn't the "sole purpose", but it's certainly looked at. I'm not saying that they will game the system by forcing page-views when not needed by the product, but that they will judge success based on usage, not average friend count.

loumf 15y ago

From a business point of view, what Google will care about is pageviews and pageviews/user (because that determines the #of ads they can show). It may be that having fewer friends makes you update more and check more often (because it's more relevant). Or it may be that having more friends causes you to check back. Another metric that drives revenue is how long you stay an active member -- that also might be better the more intimate your relationships are.

tbh2347 15y ago
People have to stop saying this. Google isn't so blind as to think every product's sole purpose is to drive pageviews. I'm speculating just as much as you are, but I don't think it's unreasonable to guess that a big part of Google+ is to drive usage of its other products. Once people start sharing directions, collaborating on documents, and so on G+ will be there to introduce users to one product after another. Sure, social ads may/will be important, but saying "what Google will care about is pageviews" is simplifying it immensely.
- loumf 15y ago
  That's why I prefaced it with "from a business point of view" -- to imply that it isn't the "sole purpose", but it's certainly looked at. I'm not saying that they will game the system by forcing page-views when not needed by the product, but that they will judge success based on usage, not average friend count.