4 ms·
>its never going to be low latency enough to be viable Why is that? Just because it's expensive in terms of computation? I can't see why latency wouldn't improv
by container 5y ago
>its never going to be low latency enough to be viable
Why is that? Just because it's expensive in terms of computation? I can't see why latency wouldn't improve with framerate.
- 411111111111111 5y agoIt couldn't because of the nature of this technology. Their post processing can only start after the full image has been rendered, so whatever photorealism filter they apply will necessarily delay the image until the process is finished.
- Scea91 5y agoThis is not a fundamental obstacle for the technology. Lots of stuff is happening in post-processing already.