6 ms·

Can you point me to the section that says that: https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/3914586/Googles-Ideological-Echo-Chamber.pdf https://assets.documentc

Can you point me to the section that says that: https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/3914586/Googles-Ideological-Echo-Chamber.pdf https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/3914586/Googles-I... Being as generous with the interpretation as possible, I guess suggesting new programs to replace existing ones could be interpreted as "programs that are aimed at a helping women and people of color should be ended", as ending one and replacing it is kind of ending. Saying "repeatedly" seems a stretch though. Can you explain what I'm missing that lead to your beliefs?

ceph_ 5y ago
Under the harms section first bullet for things to end: "Programs, mentoring, and classes only for people with a certain gender or race"
- imperfectcats 5y ago
  OK, so you read that section and see it as "repeatedly said programs that are aimed at a helping women and people of color should be ended"? There is another section with programs Damore claimed would be more effective. I am confused why replacing programs equates to ending them. Unless the goal is only to have good intentions, shouldn't the effectiveness of programs matter?
- dqv 5y ago
  My interpretation: He uses that to suggest the programs increase racial tensions, not to suggest that we shouldn't be trying to get more people of color involved in tech. He cites this article [0] as his reasoning. Is there something I'm missing? [0]: http://archive.is/00yb5 http://archive.is/00yb5