6 ms·
I'm reading she essentially agreed to a contract in the form of the "team rules" and then violated those rules for which she was held accountable. This isn't
by MelvinButtsESQ 5y ago
I'm reading she essentially agreed to a contract in the form of the "team rules" and then violated those rules for which she was held accountable. This isn't a free speech issue, it is a contractual issue.
- tclancy 5y agoYou need to be 18 in PA to legally sign a binding contract as best I can tell. https://law.jrank.org/pages/11848/Legal-Ages.html https://law.jrank.org/pages/11848/Legal-Ages.html
- kube-system 5y agoContract law is not ultimate. If your contract violates other laws, or is missing elements of a valid contract, then it could be invalidated.
- agloeregrets 5y agoSuper iffy for two general reasons: 1: She could not legally sign that contract 2: The cheerleading team is ultimately an extension of the government (as it is part of a government institution). By literal means, the state is punishing someone for what is ultimately private, off-campus speech. A lawyer with goals in life would see that as a case worth fighting.