7 ms·
MacBook Pro 13-inch with M1
- Ayesh 6y agoSummary: - 8 cores, 16 core neural engine. - GPU, RAM, Secure enclave and CPU integrated. - 5.x graphics performance. - 10h more battery life. - Thunderbolt/USB 4. Available from today, starts shipping next week. Price starts at $1299, or $1199 for education. Edit: 8GB RAM + 256GB SSD: $1299, 16GB RAM + 512GB SSD: 1499.
- cube2222 6y agoWith 8GB and 16GB options available.
- Ayesh 6y agoThank you, I updated the comment.
- vetinari 6y ago> - 8 cores, It is big.LITTLE, so 4 fast + 4 slow cores.
- AnonHP 6y agoSeriously, it should be a crime to sell machines with 256GB SSD in 2020. All these starting prices look low, but those low end configurations will be a drag because of the RAM and storage decisions.
- saagarjha 6y ago256 GB is perfectly adequate for many people who store their data in the cloud or don't create much of it in the first place.
- sto_hristo 6y ago256 GB is an insult to everyone. And most people don't store all their data in cLoUd, just some minor, select stuff - that is why absolutely everyone has GBs of free storage from so many vendors. If most used the cloud heavily, those whole thing will collapse in an afternoon.
- saagarjha 6y agoYou don't get to speak for everyone. Especially if you are not aware of the many people who are just fine with working in even more "constrained" environments like Chromebooks.
- wayneftw 6y agoThis is a “Pro” machine though. It’s the exact opposite market, not for people who can fit on a Chromebook. Rationalize however you want for yourself - pros that choose to use Apple products are already generally aware of how their hardware money grab works.
- saagarjha 6y agoIf you looked at where it fits in the lineup, you would understand that it is not meant to fit in to the market you are trying to put it in.
- ullanta 6y agoPretty much any pro - in audio/video at least - is not going to be using the built-in drive for projects. Even 2TB doesn’t cut it. So pros are using external storage anyway.
- sto_hristo 6y agoNeither do you, special guy. For the many people that are just fine with a Choromebook, make a MacChromebook. But market BS like 256 GB as pro and put it a ridiculous price tag - that is just plain nonsense.
- bserge 6y agoMakes more sense if you think of it like a Chromebook and use cloud storage and software. Sadly Internet connectivity isn't that good for everyone, even in developed cities.
- joemi 6y agoI'm not seeing the "16GB RAM + 512GB SSD: 1499" configuration on the Buy page. The $1499 one says it has 8GB RAM, and any ones with more RAM say they have Intel chips, not the M1. If I'm missing it or if there's some other way to get that config, do tell, since that's the config I'm interested in!
- stocknoob 6y ago+8GB RAM: $200 +256GB SSD: $200 It's $1299 + $200 + $200 = $1699 for both upgrades.
- klelatti 6y agoThis appears to replace the low end MacBook Pro with the higher end Intel models still available.
- andr 6y agoThe basic configuration still ships with 8GB of RAM. 16GB is $200 extra. I had an 8GB MacBook Pro in 2013. It wasn't enough then, it's absolutely inadequate now.
- cs02rm0 6y agoYep, I had a 13" 16GB MBP in 2013. These don't seem very enticing.
- crazygringo 6y agoIf you're not running VM's or opening hundreds of tabs in Chrome it's perfectly fine for everyday tasks. I'm using my 2016 MBP with 8 GB and have never had a problem except when trying to run multiple VM's. So 8 GB doesn't seem unreasonable as a minimum. You can upgrade if you need the extra, but a large number of buyers don't need it and prefer a cheaper base price.
- virgilp 6y agoYeah but is this a pro machine? I'd have no problem with 8Gb on an "Air", but for a pro machine to be 16Gb max, it does seem inadequate
- crazygringo 6y agoA lot of pro workloads are CPU-intensive, not memory-intensive. E.g. a lot of audiovisual work. The pro line has always been defined by CPU and graphics/display capabilities. Memory is there to purchase if you're in the subset that has memory-intensive workloads.
- 00deadbeef 6y agoIt isn't there to purchase, it's maxed out at a measly 16GB. Plenty of workloads are RAM-intensive, but people who need more RAM are forced to spend $500 for a slower Intel CPU and GPU.
- lord_sudo 6y agoWhy are they limited to 16gb? Is this related to the arm chip design?
- Ayesh 6y agoARM chip design is likely the reason, because I only see 16GB max to configure even in Mac mini.
- CalChris 6y agoThe Apple M1 is an Apple chip design. It uses the Big Little model and Apple designed the Big (Firestorm?) and the Little (Icestorm?). So it probably isn't related to ARM chip design.
- mlindner 6y agoThe DRAM is embedded into the same SoC as the GPU and CPU. Hard to have a lot of DRAM inside a small package.
- 00deadbeef 6y agoI wonder how they're going to replace the MacBook Pro 16" which has 64GB BTO options. Even the Mac Mini had a 64GB option but it too is stuck at just 16GB max. Will they produce a massive package to accommodate it?
- k0stas 6y agoIt seems to be due to the fact they are integrating the DRAM into the package. There is only room for two 8GB DIMMs: https://www.apple.com/v/mac/m1/a/images/overview/chip__fffqz3ljssi2_large_2x.jpg https://www.apple.com/v/mac/m1/a/images/overview/chip__fffqz...
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- cyrusmg 6y agoAre there any independent performance comparisons for x86 apps ? (I guess not yet, but still worth to ask here)
- Ayesh 6y agoThere were some geekbench results posted online, that ranged single core performance from ~600-1100, compared to the ~1150 in last Intel MacBook Pro.
- spuz 6y agoThe 2.8x faster CPU claim is based on the following fine print: > Testing conducted by Apple in October 2020 using preproduction 13-inch MacBook Pro systems with Apple M1 chip, as well as production 1.7GHz quad-core Intel Core i7-based 13-inch MacBook Pro systems, all configured with 16GB RAM and 2TB SSD. Open source project built with prerelease Xcode 12.2 with Apple Clang 12.0.0, Ninja 1.10.0.git, and CMake 3.16.5. Performance tests are conducted using specific computer systems and reflect the approximate performance of MacBook Pro. I can't find any 2020 model of the Macbook Pro with a 1.7Ghz i7 chip so I'm wondering if they are comparing it with an even older model. Would definitely wait for these to get in the hands of viewers before taking Apple at their word. Edit: Looks like they are comparing with the Intel 8th-gen i7 version of the A2289 model which was released in May this year. There was a small deal made at the time when they released new Macbooks with both 8th-gen and 10th-gen models. Apparently there is not much difference between the 8th-gen and the 10th-gen chips in terms of CPU performance but it's still a bit disingenuous of Apple not to compare with the best of their previous models. https://www.howtogeek.com/671586/should-you-buy-the-13-inch-macbook-pro-2020/ https://www.howtogeek.com/671586/should-you-buy-the-13-inch-... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-hSOuK7qBgM https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-hSOuK7qBgM
- post_break 6y agoHere is the 1.7ghz https://everymac.com/systems/apple/macbook_pro/specs/macbook-pro-core-i7-1.7-quad-core-13-2020-2-thunderbolt-3-ports-scissor-specs.html https://everymac.com/systems/apple/macbook_pro/specs/macbook...
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- bserge 6y agoIt's the Intel i7-8557u, which is pretty good. Twice the performance though? Likely in very specific benchmarks. Still, this is pretty impressive, and I say this as someone who will never buy Apple hardware.
- derefr 6y ago
- post_break 6y agoIntel MacBook Pro gets 4 ports, this only has two which is odd and annoying.
- saagarjha 6y agoNot every Intel MacBook Pro has 4 ports. This is clearly meant to replace the 2-port model.
- post_break 6y agoEvery Intel MacBook Pro apple sells new is 4 port now.
- saagarjha 6y agoYep, so I guess it was an effective replacement ;)
- gbear605 6y agoThe 13” Intel MacBook Pro only had two ports. It was occasionally frustrating to deal with, and the only reason it wasn’t more so was a USB hub. Source: I had one up until last week.
- sschueller 6y agoIs the "Pro" still appropriate?
- wmf 6y agoWhy wouldn't it be? They showed compiling and Resolve.
- bserge 6y agoI'm actually impressed by an ARM chip having so much performance. Although I shouldn't be, my smartphone has the processing power of an XBox One - unthinkable even 4 years ago, at least for me. Everything being on such a small package must leave room for a lot of battery cells.
- dang 6y agoMain threads: on M1 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25049079 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25049079 on Mac https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25049528 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25049528
- siphor 6y agothey haven't given up on the touch-bar yet, which is a bummer.
- srgpqt 6y agoIf that's an issue for you (like it was for me), get one of the Macbook Air models released this year. No touchbar, has a great keyboard, and pro enough for most uses.
- Geee 6y agoSo, the baseline model has the M1 and the more expensive version has Intel i5. What's the point if the M1 is supposedly faster (or is it)?
- derefr 6y agoA discrete GPU and more DRAM than can fit on the SoC package, neither of which the MBP13 now has access to. I'm betting the M1 can't actually work with discrete GPUs (though it remains to be seen what happens if you plug an M1 Mac into an eGPU. What do Thunderbolt-supporting ARM devices generally do with an eGPU?) Instead, discrete GPU support (and off-package [hierarchically-managed?] DRAM support) is waiting for the M1X-or-whatever, the next chip. Along with that chip, they'll refresh all the discrete-GPU product lines: the higher-end MBPs, the iMacs, and the Mac Pro. (Personally, I'm betting that Apple will take this opportunity to get rid of truly discrete GPUs in their products, and instead partner with a graphics company like AMD to license IP cores to put in their higher-end SoCs. So you could see e.g. AMD's next-gen Vega with their Smart Access Memory tech, wired to Apple's SoC-internal UMA bus.)
- cerium141 6y agoAs someone dying to replace their 2017 15" Pro with something with a usable keyboard, I don't know if I'm convinced. Two fewer ports, a max of 16 GB of RAM, and no chassis redesign. Curious if anyone in a similar boat is planning on taking the plunge?
- icathrine 6y agoI’d just some weeks ago order MacBook Pro 13’ 512 gb, 16gb 2,3 ghz 4 core intel core i7 (10.gen), turboboozt up til 4,1. Still waiting for it to deliver! What to to? Cancel it and buy the new one with m1?
- throwaway546456 6y agoVery dissapointed: * only 16gb ram max * only 2x usb-c port (connect one to charger and choose if wanna have external monitor on debugging iphone app via wired cable or... go with the dongles) * still old 720 webcam * old design and old hardware except new SoC and Wifi 6 * only 8 CPU (4 performance and 4 efficiency cores) - no upgrade options * supposed to be usb 4.0 but "USB 3.1 Gen 2 (up to 10Gb/s)" instead of 20Gb/s * no any innovation: * no esim * no truedepth camera * no fast charging * no reverse charing * no magnetic charger * no IMU sensors * no gps * no smaller bezel * no bluetooth 5.1 * "faster than 98% best selling PC laptops" - but best selling PC is usually cheap. what are those 2% laptops? Interesting how it stucks with thinkpads and dell XPS that will still cost a fraction of those mac with 16gb and 1tb ssd * "2x faster ssd than previous macbook air" 2018 macbook air had 2GB/s but 2019 only 1.3GB so that would be around 2.6GB/s - nothing special comparing you can get faster SSD very cheap today e.g. 1TB 3500 / 3000 MB/s nvme SSD you can get for just $135 * keep in mind those 8GB or 16GB will be shared between GPU and CPU - have fun connecting your macbook pro 13 that starts with 8GB to 4k display * "16x faster ML" seems likely only affects inference and 16x only related to previous macbook air/pro (instead of PC or macbook 16 with discrete GPU) * tensorflow seems only accelerated for inference - seems unlikely can be used for training but let's see. * price still the same, didn't get any 'bone' like making it cheaper or starting with higher SSD or RAM as a base * macbook pro starts with just 8GB ram and 256GB SSD [edit: formatting]
- jojule 6y agoAny guesses for GeekBench 5 scores? My expectations: - Single core: 1600-2000 range - Multi core: 7000-10000 range - Metal: 19000-23000 range