6 ms·
I would argue that having your repository on github is a strong way to say "feel free to contribute". Not saying spam is OK, just that having to ask repo mainta
by artonge 6y ago
I would argue that having your repository on github is a strong way to say "feel free to contribute". Not saying spam is OK, just that having to ask repo maintainers their authorisation seems superfluous.
- watwut 6y agoFeel free to "contribute and get nothing" is completely different then "contribute get tshirt". The people who participate are different and pull requests are different.
- sofixa 6y agoHow are they different as long as they are not spam? Good contributions are good contributions and help, regardless if there's a crappy t-shirt or not in exchange for them
- jpindar 6y agoYou're clearly not aware of what's been happening the past few days. It's not good contributions or help.
- curryst 6y agoIt's the incentive structure. It's effectively Goodhart's Law in action: When a measure becomes a target, it ceases to be a good measure. In this case, the measure is "number of pull requests", and the result of making it a measure is that people created an insane number of PRs that simply adjusted white space in a README or slightly reworded phrases but kept the exact same meaning. Because they wanted the T shirt, because they felt that it validated them as a developer (ignoring that good contributions would have been a much better validation).