7 ms·
> According to a judge or a police officer, probably not I'd naively hope that a judge wouldn't side with a police officer here, but I think the fact that resi
by p0llard 6y ago
> According to a judge or a police officer, probably not
I'd naively hope that a judge wouldn't side with a police officer here, but I think the fact that resisting arrest is inherently criminal is a pretty big flaw in the US legal system.
I live in a jurisdiction [1] where resisting arrest is not criminalised in the same sense as the US, and the idea that a police officer could unlawfully arrest you and then immediately have lawful grounds if you resisted is very alien to me.
[1] : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Resisting_arrest#England_and_Wales https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Resisting_arrest#England_and_W...
- projektfu 6y agoSince the '70s it feels like law enforcement (and juries to some extent) are informed by two movies much more than the Constitution and case law: Dirty Harry and Death Wish.
- non-entity 6y agoI saw a interesting clip on TV a while back where they played several clips of various popular police dramas in which the main characters use wildly illegal or unconstitutional tricks to get confessions from criminals. Things like physically assaulting them while contained and. turning off cameras in interrogation rooms to do so. The point it was trying to make was that this "desensitized" people to police violence. Of course, the criminals in the clips were things like child predators, serial killers, etc. so it was all justified.
- sudosysgen 6y agohttps://youtu.be/MF--2o71w44 https://youtu.be/MF--2o71w44 This is a pretty good video analysing law enforcement and how it got to become the way it is through the analysis of Dirty Harry.
- projektfu 6y agoInteresting presentation