7 ms·
Quite similar to render.com or ?
by vidar 6y ago
Quite similar to render.com or ?
- vidar 6y agoOk had a better look and this seems entirely focused on the dev experience, no plans for production hosting?
- podoman 6y agoNot in the near future. We've realized that the "staging" workflow is quite different than production, and companies like Render, Heroku, etc.. are missing a few key features that we wished were there; so we're doubling down on per-PR staging.
- ianwalter 6y agoYea I had the same question. I'm interested in this but it doesn't make sense for me without the production piece or having it run on top of our own Kubernetes cluster.
- podoman 6y agoWe do offer an on-prem solution if you're interested. You could simply spin up a kubernetes cluster on your infra and "helm apply". Feel free to reach out at my email above if you want more specifics.
- kopochameleon 6y agoCurious what other things you're using in your stack?
- podoman 6y agoThe infra is scheduled on k8s. Happy to answer other specifics!
- truesy 6y agoSimilar to https://vercel.com/docs/v2/git-integrations/vercel-for-github https://vercel.com/docs/v2/git-integrations/vercel-for-githu... as well I did a similar project that I pitched to a few VCs, got negative feedback, then saw Vercel (was Zeit at the time) launch that feature. So I archived the project & OS'd it. Guess I should have pressed on
- ianwalter 6y agoRunnable did this and got acquired by MuleSoft. Heroku also has this feature. Vercel is less comparable since it's only for serverless. Can you link to your project?
- podoman 6y agoI think this might also have to do with timing. As in, this "per-PR" iteration model is now becoming popular. In our minds, after CI/CD, the next thing to automate are ~full deployments.