8 ms·
Not necessarily, TURN servers should only be required for strict NAT. It seems that 92%* for connections are not behind strict NATs. *https://developers.google
by mothepro 6y ago
Not necessarily, TURN servers should only be required for strict NAT.
It seems that 92%* for connections are not behind strict NATs.
*https://developers.google.com/talk/libjingle/important_concepts?csw=1#portssocketsconnections https://developers.google.com/talk/libjingle/important_conce...
- FR10 6y agoIn my tests with 10 people 5 needed TURN, ISPs in my country are really something special.
- bkanber 6y agoSTUN fails under symmetric NAT, not strict NAT. That google document makes no citations of that 92% figure, but I assume that's for desktop traffic only. Pretty much all mobile/cellular connections would require TURN too.
- cma 6y agoI haven't found Verizon or AT&T to need TURN, but maybe clients on them would if connecting to each other.