8 ms·

This is a law suit over Google Analytics and JavaScript based tracking, not browser based tracking in Incognito mode.

48309248302 6y ago
It's hard to make that argument when you control the browsing device that tells users that they are in private mode, but then identify specific devices and users from the other end of the network with your other product.
- thorum 6y ago
  Chrome's Incognito mode is pretty clear about what it does, and clearly states the fact that websites and ISPs can still track you. Private Browsing has never been about hiding your traffic from analytics AFAIK. It's about your local browser history only.
  - 48309248302 6y ago
    Google is not the ambiguous other "websites and ISPs." They are the ones making the claim that you are in private mode with a Google product, even though you aren't. Users don't know how things work. They read that as if Google is respecting privacy, not tracking everything they do.
  - geofft 6y ago
    Yup. Here's what it says precisely: > Now you can browse privately, and other people who use this device won't see your activity. However, downloads and bookmarks will be saved. Learn more > Chrome won't save the following information: > Your browsing history > Cookies and site data > Information entered in forms > Your activity might still be visible to: > Websites you visit > Your employer or school > Your internet service provider Seems pretty clear.
    - 48309248302 6y ago
      One more to add: > Google
      - geofft 6y ago
        Last I checked, Google was a website.
        48309248302 6y ago
        Google is a company. Their tracking code isn't a website. It doesn't mention to users that that their private browsing mode doesn't actually protect users from their other products.
        kinkrtyavimoodh 6y ago
        Yes, because it is not relevant. The website the user is browsing is what decided to put Google Analytics code on their page. It is their responsibility to tell their users that Google will get this data.
        48309248302 6y ago
        I think that would be a disingenuous argument from Google. Google is directly receiving the analytics data and then feeding only a portion of it to the website. They know that users are easily confused and don't fully understand that one Google product doesn't respect another Google product's "privacy" settings. Most of them probably don't even know what Google Analytics is or how Google makes money by tracking them.
        kinkrtyavimoodh 6y ago
        There is no 'privacy' setting being flouted, other than one that's been entirely imagined up by commenters here. In fact, if anything people should be against this kind of interaction between two completely independent arms of Google. Isn't that what the "Break Google Up" crowd wanted?
  - skymt 6y ago
    Firefox's private browsing feature blocks tracking scripts. Edge's doesn't as far as I can tell, and I haven't looked into the behavior of smaller Chromium-based browsers. https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/enhanced-tracking-protection-firefox-desktop https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/enhanced-tracking-prote...
  - cosmodisk 6y ago
    People are naïve when it comes to this: had a manager some years ago who used to watch porn usin company's phone in private mode.Got asked to attend a meeting in the head office just to be shown pages upon pages of browsing activities he had,while at work. Nearly got kicked out. In my current job I did tell pretty much everyone ( to their surprise) that private mode won't stop me from asking network logs from our IT support company.
hatmatrix 6y ago
I thought the recent revelation was that Chrome tracks you with a unique ID except in incognito mode.

It's hard to make that argument when you control the browsing device that tells users that they are in private mode, but then identify specific devices and users from the other end of the network with your other product.

thorum 6y ago
Chrome's Incognito mode is pretty clear about what it does, and clearly states the fact that websites and ISPs can still track you. Private Browsing has never been about hiding your traffic from analytics AFAIK. It's about your local browser history only.
- 48309248302 6y ago
  Google is not the ambiguous other "websites and ISPs." They are the ones making the claim that you are in private mode with a Google product, even though you aren't. Users don't know how things work. They read that as if Google is respecting privacy, not tracking everything they do.
- geofft 6y ago
  Yup. Here's what it says precisely: > Now you can browse privately, and other people who use this device won't see your activity. However, downloads and bookmarks will be saved. Learn more > Chrome won't save the following information: > Your browsing history > Cookies and site data > Information entered in forms > Your activity might still be visible to: > Websites you visit > Your employer or school > Your internet service provider Seems pretty clear.
  - 48309248302 6y ago
    One more to add: > Google
    - geofft 6y ago
      Last I checked, Google was a website.
      - 48309248302 6y ago
        Google is a company. Their tracking code isn't a website. It doesn't mention to users that that their private browsing mode doesn't actually protect users from their other products.
        kinkrtyavimoodh 6y ago
        Yes, because it is not relevant. The website the user is browsing is what decided to put Google Analytics code on their page. It is their responsibility to tell their users that Google will get this data.
        48309248302 6y ago
        I think that would be a disingenuous argument from Google. Google is directly receiving the analytics data and then feeding only a portion of it to the website. They know that users are easily confused and don't fully understand that one Google product doesn't respect another Google product's "privacy" settings. Most of them probably don't even know what Google Analytics is or how Google makes money by tracking them.
        kinkrtyavimoodh 6y ago
        There is no 'privacy' setting being flouted, other than one that's been entirely imagined up by commenters here. In fact, if anything people should be against this kind of interaction between two completely independent arms of Google. Isn't that what the "Break Google Up" crowd wanted?
- skymt 6y ago
  Firefox's private browsing feature blocks tracking scripts. Edge's doesn't as far as I can tell, and I haven't looked into the behavior of smaller Chromium-based browsers. https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/enhanced-tracking-protection-firefox-desktop https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/enhanced-tracking-prote...
- cosmodisk 6y ago
  People are naïve when it comes to this: had a manager some years ago who used to watch porn usin company's phone in private mode.Got asked to attend a meeting in the head office just to be shown pages upon pages of browsing activities he had,while at work. Nearly got kicked out. In my current job I did tell pretty much everyone ( to their surprise) that private mode won't stop me from asking network logs from our IT support company.

hatmatrix 6y ago

I thought the recent revelation was that Chrome tracks you with a unique ID except in incognito mode.