7 ms·
It would be historically correct, though.
by vraivroo 7y ago
It would be historically correct, though.
- bad_user 7y agoWhat do you mean by "historically correct"? You mean blaming sugar or meat when historically people started eating too much, in the 20th century, due to food availability?
- vraivroo 7y agoThe real evil came from the sugar and meat industries, who knew their products caused disease, but paid researchers to cover it up. You my friend are but another victim of their propaganda.
- vezycash 7y agoEverything has become more abundant recently - clean water, vegetable, meat, fat, sugar, even clean water. And less hunger too. I remember yawning repeatedly / feeling faint when I was younger but didn't know what I hungry until my mum pointed it out. So you can't point to one or two food groups and claim their current abundance cause obesity. Well, except white sugar lol.