6 ms·
> Female soccer players make less money because less people watch and there is less money I think this is a great example! The US women's soccer team is bette
by mffnbs 7y ago
> Female soccer players make less money because less people watch and there is less money
I think this is a great example! The US women's soccer team is better than the men's but they make a fraction of the money. It's not their fault that sports have a sexist history that influences viewership, ad revenue, and ultimately their salaries.
- tomp 7y agoIt's not "sexist history", it's just that men are better at (almost all) sports. Male football is simply more exciting to watch (I imagine, for broader audiences... it's boring to me, in general). For modeling, it's the reverse.
- hadesenia 7y agoHow is men’s soccer more exciting to watch rather than woman’s soccer? It’s literally people kicking a ball around. Does the ball explode if you are a man and kicking it?
- Ohn0 7y agolol no, but the men kick the ball harder?
- iagovar 7y agoWell, I can tell the difference. Men look more aggressive and professional overall. I mean, the US women national team lost to kids etc, so you tell me. We have some women teams here in Spain, and while there's some movement in the league honestly it feels... like watching amateurish football. I guess they need time to catch on, but meanwhile it's not very appealing.
- burfog 7y agoYes, the ball does explode. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sr1KB4Csp00 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sr1KB4Csp00 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O5v4RvbjRqY https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O5v4RvbjRqY
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]
- mffnbs 7y agoThere was a time when women weren't allowed to play professional soccer. It can't not have a sexist history.
- amishadowbanned 7y agothe sexist history is that people prefer watching better athletes.
- magduf 7y agoWomen can be just as athletic as men, and can easily beat them in many sports. It just depends on the sport. If the sport requires upper-body strength, forget it: men will always have a huge advantage here. But if upper-body strength is no help, and lower-body strength and endurance are important, women can do better. Off the top of my head, I'd point to endurance running: women have longer legs proportionally, and more fat reserves, and don't have to waste a lot of energy carrying around a lot of chest/arm muscles and bigger upper-body bones. They can also do well in downhill skiing, bicycling, etc. Also, over in Tennessee, the UT women's basketball team has been much, much more popular for decades now than the men's team ever was.