6 ms·

Sadly, the performance inspector is still pretty useless compared to what Chromium is offering.

• leeoniya 7y ago
  this is the biggest blocker for me. i still use ff as my main browser, but i cannot develop with it, so i have to spend a lot of my time in chrome. we had a recent dialog about it here: https://old.reddit.com/r/javascript/comments/ecyhmr/mozilla_survey_how_can_devtools_support_you/fbez5c0/ https://old.reddit.com/r/javascript/comments/ecyhmr/mozilla_... there's some cool stuff in the works but it doesnt sound like there's a plan to internalize the work into devtools but to keep it as a web app and rely on a serviceworker for "localness" - not great, imo.
  • digitarald 7y ago
    Thanks again for that discussion, it already spawned some follow up.
• Moru 7y ago
  Sadly noone cares what the performance inspector says. Newspapers just get slower and slower. Our local newspaper takes 15 seconds to first visible paint and another 5-10 seconds to usefulness on my phone...
• omaranto 7y ago
  My impression as a web user is that if any devs actually use the performance inspector it's just to learn their site is slow and then not do anything about it.
  • folkrav 7y ago
    Your devs might develop perfectly well behaving stuff just to see it get totally obliterated by loading 3 external tracking scripts through Tag Manager, three different pixels and 7 external contact form/chat bots/newsletter popover scripts from their CRM/ad platform/whatever crap marketing wants.
• Vinnl 7y ago
  They're working on a new one that seems pretty cool, although you currently have to install it as an Add-on to use it: https://profiler.firefox.com/ https://profiler.firefox.com/