15 ms·
On your site I can consistently get 100% by looking at the backgrounds since they generate in somewhat inorganic patterns.
by ImminentFate 7y ago
On your site I can consistently get 100% by looking at the backgrounds since they generate in somewhat inorganic patterns.
- ebg13 7y agoThat's speculative at best. What's inorganic about the background in https://veedrac.github.io/stylegan2-real-or-fake/Curated/ffhq-0987.png https://veedrac.github.io/stylegan2-real-or-fake/Curated/ffh... ?
- gajomi 7y agoHow is it speculative? The background does not always allow for the discrimination to be made but in the random sample of ~20 faces I looked it was the main factor in maybe 1/4 of the cases (I was %100 accurate on this random sample). Of course, my random sample is not your random sample. We could probably do a controlled experiment to get at these kinds of attributions systematically. I might also say that a second major discriminating factor is skin texture, especially at boundaries.
- nuccy 7y agoAlso after watching the video from the StyleGAN2 team https://drive.google.com/file/d/1f_gbKW6FUUHKkUxciJ_lQx29mCq_fSBy/view https://drive.google.com/file/d/1f_gbKW6FUUHKkUxciJ_lQx29mCq... now I know that original StyleGAN, images from which are apparently used for this "game", produces faces with a "water droplet" and phase artifacts, so I was able to spot few fakes just by looking for those things.
- Veedrac 7y agoOnly whichfaceisreal.com uses the original StyleGAN. The github.io links use StyleGAN2.
- TomVDB 7y agoWhen not the ears, it's the background. If the real pictures had the background removed, I'd have a very hard time scoring 100%.
- Veedrac 7y agoThat's the point of the hard version.