16 ms·
This reminds me of a short story by Paul Ford from a few years back[1]: We had gone to a baseball game at the beginning of the season. They had played a song o
by josecastillo 7y ago
This reminds me of a short story by Paul Ford from a few years back[1]:
We had gone to a baseball game at the beginning of the season. They had played a song on the public address system, and she sang along without permission. They used to factor that into ticket price—they still do if you pay extra or have a season pass—but now other companies handled the followup. And here was the video from that day, one of many tens of thousands simultaneously recorded from gun scanners on the stadium roof. In the video my daughter wore a cap and a blue T-shirt. I sat beside her, my arm over her shoulder, grinning. Her voice was clear and high; the ambient roar of the audience beyond us filtered down to static...
I told my waiting daughter to go ahead and pay the few dollars, just part of the latent cost of a ticket. She tapped and the tablet made its cash-register sound, and the video was irrevocably destroyed so that it could never again be shared.
[1] https://www.ftrain.com/nanolaw https://www.ftrain.com/nanolaw
- sneakernets 7y agoI had written (in college) a small story about an "RIAA Task Force" collaborating with the FBI to raid small brick-and-mortar businesses with occupants above some fabled "listener limit" that dared to have an FM Radio or iPod connected to a boombox in the corner of the store somewhere. Everything from Barbershops to Butchershops were raided, and the small infringing devices confiscated. Given that the RIAA tried to sue a grandmother once, This wasn't too far-fetched.
- jacquesm 7y agoYou think that's fiction? In NL we actually have this...
- ikeyany 7y agoWhy is it illegal to amplify music in your store if you paid for the music?
- bhelkey 7y agoShould it be legal to create a drive-in that plays movies off of Netflix?
- Nextgrid 7y agoUnpopular opinion, but I would say yes. It doesn’t cost Netflix any more money whether one person or 10 people are watching a particular subscription. I’d say the major appeal of the drive-in is the venue and all the accessories (big screen, sound, etc) - otherwise you’d just pay for Netflix yourself and watch it at home.
- deelowe 7y agoOpportunity cost is real...
- Nextgrid 7y agoI mean I understand both sides of the argument, but it seems like physical goods manufacturers are doing fine without enforcing restrictions on how their goods are used (I am free to buy an off-the-shelf power tool and then rent it out without paying extra to the manufacturer), so why are we giving this exception to content producers? In my opinion the law should be changed that content you pay for can be used as you wish except copying (otherwise you'd just copy it and resell). It'll drive up the prices of the "source" content, but the market will quickly fill the gap by offering affordable access to broadcasted versions of such content.
- icebraining 7y ago> otherwise you’d just pay for Netflix Yes, that's the point: if not for the drive-in, you'd pay for Netflix. A more interesting question is: why can't one create that drive-in, as long as only Netflix subscribers can enter? If "it's a license, not a product" like these companies shout, trying to prevent legitimate ownership rights, the license should work anywhere.
- greedo 7y agoActually it would be either ASCAP or BMI that enforces this fee. When I owned a small restaurant, I had to pay for the privilege of playing CDs over a stereo.
- dls2016 7y agoASCAP shakes down bars all the time. https://pitchfork.com/news/ascap-hit-multiple-us-bars-with-copyright-lawsuits/ https://pitchfork.com/news/ascap-hit-multiple-us-bars-with-c...