121 ms·
I wish they didn't use G Suite: ``` <<>> DiG 9.9.7-P3 <<>> mozilla.org mx ;; global options: +cmd ;; Got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR
by cdransf 7y ago
I wish they didn't use G Suite:
```
<<>> DiG 9.9.7-P3 <<>> mozilla.org mx
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 42182
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 4, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1
;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION:
; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 4096
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;mozilla.org. IN MX
;; ANSWER SECTION:
mozilla.org. 60 IN MX 5 alt1.aspmx.l.google.com.
mozilla.org. 60 IN MX 5 alt2.aspmx.l.google.com.
mozilla.org. 60 IN MX 10 aspmx3.googlemail.com.
mozilla.org. 60 IN MX 1 aspmx.l.google.com.
;; Query time: 39 msec
;; SERVER: 172.26.38.1#53(172.26.38.1)
;; WHEN: Fri Jun 07 10:30:00 PDT 2019
;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 150
```
- bastawhiz 7y agoOf all the things I wish Mozilla did differently, their choice of internal corporate email provider is roughly at the bottom of the list. Using a FOSS solution provides essentially zero benefit to even a fraction of a percent of their users.
- cdransf 7y agoSure, but it undermines their public opposition to Google and their practices. DuckDuckGo appears to operate just fine on Fastmail.
- h1d 7y agoWhy would they oppose Google when they're Mozilla's wallet? Where else does Mozilla get revenues from?
- pbhjpbhj 7y agoTheir job seems to be to appear to geeks as if they oppose Google whilst still funnelling as much useful traffic/data to Google as possible. Then people who oppose Google can use Firefox, thinking it helps, when it probably helps a lot less. It would be like a political party being the main donor to the second choice party.
- afiori 7y agoThey do not oppose Google. They oppose Google privacy practices,