53 ms·

I'm not. My point was that Docker purports to solve the sandboxing and security problems. In reality, this is something that 90% of people who use Docker don'

I'm not. My point was that Docker purports to solve the sandboxing and security problems. In reality, this is something that 90% of people who use Docker don't give a shit about. For the vast majority Docker is just a nice and easy-to-use packaging format. The sad part is that a) Docker failed at security. b) In trying to solve the security problem Docker ended up with a pretty crufty (from a technical point of view) packaging format. Maybe we need to start from scratch, listen to the devs this time and build something they actually want.

kkapelon 7y ago
>My point was that Docker purports to solve the sandboxing and security problems. Says who? The article I linked to you says nothing about security. >Docker failed at security. If somebody thinks security is the strong feature of Docker he/she is misinformed. >For the vast majority Docker is just a nice and easy-to-use packaging format For the vast majority of who? Developers? Sys admins? PMs? The big advantage of docker is the self-contained environment for CI builds.