6 ms·

Between Panic and Teenage Engineering I actually have faith in this being a worthwhile endeavor. From the face of it I would expect this to go the way of the Ou

Between Panic and Teenage Engineering I actually have faith in this being a worthwhile endeavor. From the face of it I would expect this to go the way of the Ouya, but with those two at the helm it could actually be something cool. It's a breath of fresh air in an otherwise stagnant casual mobile gaming space.

binaryblitz 7y ago
> stagnant casual mobile gaming space Between Switch and a lot of great mobile games I'm not sure how it's stagnant.
- Zenbit_UX 7y ago
  Do people consider the switch a mobile platform? I mean it sort of is but... It's really a console. Depends how you define mobile, if mobile === carry in your pocket it's not. If mobile === independent from a TV then yes.
  - adangert 7y ago
    yeah, I bring it around with me, as a portable gaming device. I consider it a mobile platform, plus I have big pockets.
  - miranda_rights 7y ago
    As a single data point, I've only played the switch with a TV once or twice, when I was playing with friends.
  - ninjin 7y ago
    In London, it does not appear to be treated like something mobile – but in Tokyo it certainly is. You will see kids – mainly boys – huddle together around Switch screens or playing using the wireless wherever you go in suburban Tokyo.
    - tommorris 7y ago
      I've seen one or two people using the Switch on the London Underground. Rare but not non-existent.
      - madeofpalk 7y ago
        ️ Until recently, I exclusively played my Switch while travelling - it’s great for planes. It’s now permanently in my backpack and I play it on the tube on my daily commute. It’s great
    - m_t 7y ago
      > In London, it does not appear to be treated like something mobile I saw a fair few people on the tube with their switch!
      - pushpop 7y ago
        I’m one of them
  - gabcoh 7y ago
    It’s very common for high school kids (in America) to take their switch from class to class and play during free periods. A lot of people take their switch everywhere in their bag and just prop it up when they want to play a quick game of smash with friends. So yes, I would definitely consider the switch mobile
  - Agentlien 7y ago
    I've played roughly 1000 hours on my switch, so far. Most of that is on the commuter train.
  - Dylan16807 7y ago
    It fits in a big pocket (or two) or a medium-small purse. I'd call it mobile.
alt-enter 7y ago
My mind immediately went to Ouya when I read the article, but the concept here seems interesting, and I hope it does better than Ouya did.
- arrrg 7y ago
  It doesn’t have the same goals as the Ouya. The Ouya wanted to be the next big thing, it wanted to be a platform. This wants to be a nice, fun, arty thing and definitely not be a platform. I don’t think it makes much sense to compare the two. A possible point of comparison for me would be Fujifilm’s very successful line of Instax instant cameras. They are similar to other cameras (phone, compact, DSLR, mirrorless) in that they take photos but framing them as a competitor to other cameras doesn’t make much sense. Taking photos with them is much more expensive (given that nobody will give up their phone for an Instax camera and practically all phones today will take better photos than Instax cameras, just purely from a technical point of view, ignoring aesthetic preferences) and the photos you do take are just much more impractical than digital photos. But that doesn’t matter at all since all of that is not the point of Instax cameras. In the gaming space the biggest actual competitor is still probably Nintendo, but not with their “normal” Games, more with their “weird” experiments like Nintendo Labo. I could actually imagine someone deciding between Labo and this.

binaryblitz 7y ago

> stagnant casual mobile gaming space Between Switch and a lot of great mobile games I'm not sure how it's stagnant.

Zenbit_UX 7y ago
Do people consider the switch a mobile platform? I mean it sort of is but... It's really a console. Depends how you define mobile, if mobile === carry in your pocket it's not. If mobile === independent from a TV then yes.
- adangert 7y ago
  yeah, I bring it around with me, as a portable gaming device. I consider it a mobile platform, plus I have big pockets.
- miranda_rights 7y ago
  As a single data point, I've only played the switch with a TV once or twice, when I was playing with friends.
- ninjin 7y ago
  In London, it does not appear to be treated like something mobile – but in Tokyo it certainly is. You will see kids – mainly boys – huddle together around Switch screens or playing using the wireless wherever you go in suburban Tokyo.
  - tommorris 7y ago
    I've seen one or two people using the Switch on the London Underground. Rare but not non-existent.
    - madeofpalk 7y ago
      ️ Until recently, I exclusively played my Switch while travelling - it’s great for planes. It’s now permanently in my backpack and I play it on the tube on my daily commute. It’s great
  - m_t 7y ago
    > In London, it does not appear to be treated like something mobile I saw a fair few people on the tube with their switch!
    - pushpop 7y ago
      I’m one of them
- gabcoh 7y ago
  It’s very common for high school kids (in America) to take their switch from class to class and play during free periods. A lot of people take their switch everywhere in their bag and just prop it up when they want to play a quick game of smash with friends. So yes, I would definitely consider the switch mobile
- Agentlien 7y ago
  I've played roughly 1000 hours on my switch, so far. Most of that is on the commuter train.
- Dylan16807 7y ago
  It fits in a big pocket (or two) or a medium-small purse. I'd call it mobile.

alt-enter 7y ago

My mind immediately went to Ouya when I read the article, but the concept here seems interesting, and I hope it does better than Ouya did.

arrrg 7y ago
It doesn’t have the same goals as the Ouya. The Ouya wanted to be the next big thing, it wanted to be a platform. This wants to be a nice, fun, arty thing and definitely not be a platform. I don’t think it makes much sense to compare the two. A possible point of comparison for me would be Fujifilm’s very successful line of Instax instant cameras. They are similar to other cameras (phone, compact, DSLR, mirrorless) in that they take photos but framing them as a competitor to other cameras doesn’t make much sense. Taking photos with them is much more expensive (given that nobody will give up their phone for an Instax camera and practically all phones today will take better photos than Instax cameras, just purely from a technical point of view, ignoring aesthetic preferences) and the photos you do take are just much more impractical than digital photos. But that doesn’t matter at all since all of that is not the point of Instax cameras. In the gaming space the biggest actual competitor is still probably Nintendo, but not with their “normal” Games, more with their “weird” experiments like Nintendo Labo. I could actually imagine someone deciding between Labo and this.