5 ms·
I thought both sides get to pick who is on the Jury?
by adventist 7y ago
I thought both sides get to pick who is on the Jury?
- civility 7y agoI'm not sure how much the rules vary, but in our case there were 18 candidate jurors and both sides were allowed to dismiss 3 without cause or justification. Additionally, if either side could argue there was a cause, additional jurors could be dismissed (requiring new jurors to be summoned), but that didn't happen. The plaintiffs removed the 3 with any college at all.
- regularfry 7y agoIs the problem not that only 3 out of 18 had college-level education? That seems like a very low number.
- kamarg 7y agoThat could be a representative sample of the area the trial was held in. Trial by jury of your peers means that some juries will be composed of mostly and sometimes even all "peers" with less formal education that most would think appropriate for the subject matter being discussed.
- keymone 7y agoRight and both sides try to make the jury as biased as possible. trying to select for objectiveness is harmful.
- UnFleshedOne 7y agoHarmful to the side doing the picking or harmful to the justice process in general?
- keymone 7y agoi would argue, both