5 ms·

I'm surprised this worked. I would have assumed he had adblock of some sort.

by rotred 8y ago

mrep 8y ago
Mobile apps and some mobile browsers don't support ad block. While I have ublock on my laptop, i still get ads when I am on my phone which ironically is where these companies get most of their revenue these days.
- kmin93 8y ago
  If you have a Raspberry Pi, look into using Pi-hole[1]. It provides network-wide blocking when installed on your home network by proxying requests. I also use AdGuard Pro[2], which provides a similar function when I'm outside my home network. Both happen to be open source software[3][4], so that's a plus. [1]: https://pi-hole.net/ https://pi-hole.net/ [2]: https://adguard.com/en/adguard-ios-pro/overview.html https://adguard.com/en/adguard-ios-pro/overview.html [3]: https://github.com/pi-hole/pi-hole https://github.com/pi-hole/pi-hole [4]: https://github.com/AdguardTeam/AdguardForiOS https://github.com/AdguardTeam/AdguardForiOS
  - ktta 8y ago
    Still doesn't block ads from the Facebook mobile app. Even if you install a root cert to MITM, some apps pin certs.
    - saagarjha 8y ago
      Of course, there are ways around this: you could make a copy of Facebook that doesn’t pin certificates.
      - deleted 8y ago
        [deleted]
      - ktta 8y ago
        True. Not for iOS though, atleast without a jailbreak.
        slackoverflower 8y ago
        And jailbreaks are getting harder and harder to find by each iOS update.
        jsjohnst 8y ago
        > Not for iOS though, atleast without a jailbreak. If you have persistence, no jailbreak is needed. Would require you to binary patch the executable then resign the binary using your own Apple Dev account. Far from trivial, but still doable and without Jailbreaking.
- godelski 8y ago
  FF on mobile supports ublock. Not going to help in apps, but you can have everything open into FF.
- propogandist 8y ago
  if you have android you can get Netguard from github [0]. Its from the Xprivacy dev; functions as a firewall (VPN), w/o root. The github version supports ability to load Hosts file that can block domains (ads) - like the hosts files used by Ublock. This generally blocks ads across the OS. iOs should have something similar. https://github.com/M66B/NetGuard/releases https://github.com/M66B/NetGuard/releases
  - mrep 8y ago
    I just tried that and reddit/facebook/chrome still showed adds.
    - propogandist 8y ago
      The goal of NetGuard is to function as a Firewall to limit apps ability to phone home without consent. The host file feature will block most in-app advertising and provide some protection for web browsing. Ads within facebook can be blocked using custom host filed within Ublock/Umatrix. I dont know about ad-blocking within the FB app itself. Generally, you should be using Firefox, not Chrome, with Ublock and/or Umatrix installed to maintain control of your web experience. FB web interface can be used and ads generally blocked. Reddit's native ads are served directly via first party URLs so it is tuff to block. Reddit's made changes for the advertisers and their new UI is meant to popularize Native ads.
- softawre 8y ago
  Blockada can block ads in other mobile apps on a non-rooted Android phone.
Mahn 8y ago
Anecdotal, but I personally don't block ads on Facebook because I want to see what other people are advertising. Perhaps he has the same philosophy.
Kiro 8y ago
Why would you assume so?
- fwn 8y ago
  Not the parent, but just a few thoughts: He is the CEO of a technology company. The necessary knowledge about the existence of content blockers as well as the technological literacy to set them up is probably a given. He also probably has a high value attached to his attention, given that he is in quite a power position. This, I'd argue, would make a greater reflection of media habits more likely. Additionally there might be the security/privacy aspect. Executives should really focus on security as their devices might be of greater value than your average grandmother's Scrabble tablet.
  - Kiro 8y ago
    We are many people that don't use adblock because we don't want to, not because we don't know how to.
    - fwn 8y ago
      That is true, I did not want to deny that. However I think that it is not very speculative to say that, if more people knew about content blocking, more people would block unwanted content. My intention behind assuming his knowledge/competence was only meant to exclude nescience from the list of potential reasons for him to not block content.
      - Kiro 8y ago
        Ok, fair enough! I misread your comment. Personally I'm thinking that since he's the CEO of a company which monetizes on ads it could be that he wants to follow ad trends, see what's going on in the ad space, what other people are advertising etc.

I'm surprised this worked. I would have assumed he had adblock of some sort.

by rotred 8y ago

I'm surprised this worked. I would have assumed he had adblock of some sort.

mrep 8y ago

Mobile apps and some mobile browsers don't support ad block. While I have ublock on my laptop, i still get ads when I am on my phone which ironically is where these companies get most of their revenue these days.

kmin93 8y ago
If you have a Raspberry Pi, look into using Pi-hole[1]. It provides network-wide blocking when installed on your home network by proxying requests. I also use AdGuard Pro[2], which provides a similar function when I'm outside my home network. Both happen to be open source software[3][4], so that's a plus. [1]: https://pi-hole.net/ https://pi-hole.net/ [2]: https://adguard.com/en/adguard-ios-pro/overview.html https://adguard.com/en/adguard-ios-pro/overview.html [3]: https://github.com/pi-hole/pi-hole https://github.com/pi-hole/pi-hole [4]: https://github.com/AdguardTeam/AdguardForiOS https://github.com/AdguardTeam/AdguardForiOS
- ktta 8y ago
  Still doesn't block ads from the Facebook mobile app. Even if you install a root cert to MITM, some apps pin certs.
  - saagarjha 8y ago
    Of course, there are ways around this: you could make a copy of Facebook that doesn’t pin certificates.
    - deleted 8y ago
      [deleted]
    - ktta 8y ago
      True. Not for iOS though, atleast without a jailbreak.
      - slackoverflower 8y ago
        And jailbreaks are getting harder and harder to find by each iOS update.
      - jsjohnst 8y ago
        > Not for iOS though, atleast without a jailbreak. If you have persistence, no jailbreak is needed. Would require you to binary patch the executable then resign the binary using your own Apple Dev account. Far from trivial, but still doable and without Jailbreaking.
godelski 8y ago
FF on mobile supports ublock. Not going to help in apps, but you can have everything open into FF.
propogandist 8y ago
if you have android you can get Netguard from github [0]. Its from the Xprivacy dev; functions as a firewall (VPN), w/o root. The github version supports ability to load Hosts file that can block domains (ads) - like the hosts files used by Ublock. This generally blocks ads across the OS. iOs should have something similar. https://github.com/M66B/NetGuard/releases https://github.com/M66B/NetGuard/releases
- mrep 8y ago
  I just tried that and reddit/facebook/chrome still showed adds.
  - propogandist 8y ago
    The goal of NetGuard is to function as a Firewall to limit apps ability to phone home without consent. The host file feature will block most in-app advertising and provide some protection for web browsing. Ads within facebook can be blocked using custom host filed within Ublock/Umatrix. I dont know about ad-blocking within the FB app itself. Generally, you should be using Firefox, not Chrome, with Ublock and/or Umatrix installed to maintain control of your web experience. FB web interface can be used and ads generally blocked. Reddit's native ads are served directly via first party URLs so it is tuff to block. Reddit's made changes for the advertisers and their new UI is meant to popularize Native ads.
softawre 8y ago
Blockada can block ads in other mobile apps on a non-rooted Android phone.

Mahn 8y ago

Anecdotal, but I personally don't block ads on Facebook because I want to see what other people are advertising. Perhaps he has the same philosophy.

Kiro 8y ago

Why would you assume so?

fwn 8y ago
Not the parent, but just a few thoughts: He is the CEO of a technology company. The necessary knowledge about the existence of content blockers as well as the technological literacy to set them up is probably a given. He also probably has a high value attached to his attention, given that he is in quite a power position. This, I'd argue, would make a greater reflection of media habits more likely. Additionally there might be the security/privacy aspect. Executives should really focus on security as their devices might be of greater value than your average grandmother's Scrabble tablet.
- Kiro 8y ago
  We are many people that don't use adblock because we don't want to, not because we don't know how to.
  - fwn 8y ago
    That is true, I did not want to deny that. However I think that it is not very speculative to say that, if more people knew about content blocking, more people would block unwanted content. My intention behind assuming his knowledge/competence was only meant to exclude nescience from the list of potential reasons for him to not block content.
    - Kiro 8y ago
      Ok, fair enough! I misread your comment. Personally I'm thinking that since he's the CEO of a company which monetizes on ads it could be that he wants to follow ad trends, see what's going on in the ad space, what other people are advertising etc.