5 ms·
Retort: That's where you're wrong! If we hooked up nine mothers to one single faetus, we could get the job done in 9 months.[0] The same way, if we hooked up ou
by stagbeetle 8y ago
Retort: That's where you're wrong! If we hooked up nine mothers to one single faetus, we could get the job done in 9 months.[0] The same way, if we hooked up our dev teams to a lead that could delegate the work properly, we could pump out a Meltdown patch in around a month and a half.
http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2012/08/28/1205282109?sid=72ab4b8c-aa60-4334-a445-a80ba4b9b066 http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2012/08/28/1205282109?sid=...
- vageli 8y ago> Retort: That's where you're wrong! If we hooked up nine mothers to one single faetus, we could get the job done in 9 months.[0] The same way, if we hooked up our dev teams to a lead that could delegate the work properly, we could pump out a Meltdown patch in around a month and a half. > http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2012/08/28/1205282109?sid=.. http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2012/08/28/1205282109?sid=.... Except this whole train of thought falls apart once you consider the difficulty of "hooking up 9 mothers to a single fetus". In the same way you down play the difficulty of coordinating multiple teams for a solution around breaking research. Show me a working solution of the former and I'll accept the corollary.