6 ms·
Likening people to Thiel is ridiculous. He is personally facing the backlash from openly supporting Trump and being a speaker at his rallies. Nobody else in the
by makewavesnotwar 9y ago
Likening people to Thiel is ridiculous. He is personally facing the backlash from openly supporting Trump and being a speaker at his rallies. Nobody else in the valley did anything as absurd or unnecessary. And if he thinks he'll fair better in LA, I think he's sorely mistaken once people start recognizing him en masse. But to my point, this article seems to be generalizing an outlier to make its point. Everyone is being alienated everywhere because the country has a leader who is actively polarizing the populous by demonizing every side that he's not on as an enemy to his agenda, even going so far now as to suggest people who disagree should be labeled as traitors - which coming from the President, is technically a death threat as that is the punishment for treason. Peter Thiel seems to be actively trying to paint a more dystopian portrait of the situation to make himself out to be a victim when in reality people on both sides have been alienated by the dissolution of the "moderate" common ground where we all worked together in favor of a Monday Night Football-esque team based society (or crime drama - good v. bad). More generalizations like this that skew reality aren't going to help anything.
- superquest 9y ago"openly supporting" the winning presidential candidate isn't "absurd".
- dabbledash 9y agoWell, normally it isn’t.
- breakyerself 9y agoNormally I'd agree with you, but Trump is a special case.
- catdograbbit 9y agoNo, he isn't. Democrats said the same thing about Bush, and they're saying the same thing about Pence. Anybody with an R next to their name would get the same backlash if they were president.
- ryanwaggoner 9y agoI can’t speak for everyone, but this isn’t true at all for me. I have disagreed with large chunks of the policies of every president in my lifetime, and voted for presidents of both parties. I’ve never doubted that any of them loved this country and took their oath of office seriously. I have zero faith that our current president cares about anything beyond himself and his image. Zero. And I’m not alone. A shocking number of conservative writers and thinkers believe Trump represents a fundamental threat to democracy. Behind closed doors, even many of his ardent public supporters have no respect or faith in him.
- breakyerself 9y agoI didn't agree with Bush's economic policy, but I didn't think he was a particularly dangerous politician and I generally supported him in the years after 9/11. Then we invaded Iraq based on false pretenses and with no plan for what to do in the days following the fall of the government. It was deceitful, disgusting and incompetent and a waste of lives and resources. So I decided Bush is a POS. It wasn't a predetermined partisan opinion. It was based on how things actually unfolded. I still think that in terms of damage done Nixon was the worst we've had and Bush comes in second. Trump is dangerous in my opinion, but nothing so far comes close to what Bush did. It's strange that you make dislike of Bush sound unreasonable. It's perfectly reasonable.
- Myrmornis 9y agoHave you not heard Trump speak?
- tensor 9y agoIt is when it implies openly supporting racism and sexism, which is why the reaction is rightly extreme.
- darkmarmot 9y agoAnd possibly treason...
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]
- chillwaves 9y agoNot to mention money laundering. Look, the charges against Trump can be argued, what cannot be argued is the attack by Russia against our country and Trump has refused to say one single bad word about Russia, while simultaneously having a public record of praising Putin and getting financed by Russian oligarchs. This is a matter of public record and fact that is beyond dispute. Lastly, both houses of congress passed additional sanctions against Russian with super majorities, beyond veto proof and Trump refuses to enact them. We are living in a constitutional crisis and for some reason every move Trump makes seems to benefit Russia. This is not normal. This is not OK.
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]
- sho 9y agoYou need to zoom way the hell out, or you will miss the forest for the trees. Whether or not Trump is personally racist or sexist or whatever is basically immaterial. The very fact of his election, and his continuing popularity despite events, is direct manifestation of deep-seated cultural problems in the USA. Simply dismissing the concerns of tens of millions of americans as "racist and sexist" is not helpful and in fact perpetuates the problem. I am not a Trump supporter, or a Thiel supporter, but it's not self-evidently bad that a person with some means chose to work with the guy in charge to try to make a difference. This kind of lazy dismissal is part of the problem.
- justAnotherNET 9y agoIt’s a shame this even has to be said here.
- sigmar 9y agoWhile I'm not sure I'd use the word "absurd," arguing that "he won, so it couldn't be absurd to support him" doesn't make sense. Lots of demagogues win elections. Winning an election doesn't automatically make you ethical or competent.
- shaftoe 9y agoNo, but it certainly makes you mainstream.
- evgen 9y agoAgreeing with 46% of the population is mainstream? Okay...
- nl 9y agoSure it is. No one claims driving a Honda Accord isn’t a mainstream choice just because they aren’t the number one selling car.
- alexqgb 9y agoNot if the election wasn't won with a majority.
- PeterisP 9y agoSure it is, if there's a 30%/70% split of viewpoints then the 30% viewpoint is a mainstream viewpoint as well, not some weird niche - it's also considered normal and conventional (though less popular than the 70% one), shared by a significant part of the people, known / acknowledged by almost everyone including the opponents.
- gameswithgo 9y agoI think it is.
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]
- wz1000 9y agoSupporting any US President of the last century or so is morally dubious(if you consider mass murder and toppling democratic regimes morally dubious). Like Chomsky likes to say, if US Presidents were held to the standards of the Nuremberg principles, they would all be executed. In that regard, Trump has so far done less harm than most recent Presidents. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5BXtgq0Nhsc https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5BXtgq0Nhsc
- askafriend 9y agoYes it is. When you support Trump, you support his vile brand of leadership. The majority in this the country do not support this man or his ideas. They simply don't. The base that supported him and made this presidency possible is collapsing by all reported metrics (as in they are literally dying off, and younger people neither support Trump's ideas nor are they as religious). So while Trump's base may have squeezed out a win last time, their chances of a repeat decrease significantly as time goes on. Time is not on their side, and I suspect History is not on their side either.
- refurb 9y agoLet me guess, you don't know any Trump supporters?
- dang 9y agoPlease don't post unsubstantive swipes in discussions here. https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
- askafriend 9y agoI've lived in the east coast, the west coast, the midwest, and the south all for extended periods in my life. I've lived in so many states in this country that I know intimately the diverse viewpoints and diverse culture that exists across America.
- huangbong 9y ago“The majority of the country does not support this man or his ideas”, says the liberal SF tech worker from the comfort of his/her Google office where all of his/her co-workers also blindly agree (except for Paul from Minneapolis, who secretly voted for and supports Trump, who would probably get fired by HR due to “poor performance” after coming out about it)
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]
- makewavesnotwar 9y agoSure it is in the way Thiel did it. It was absurd for him to go on national television to make statements with 0 impact. Trump didn't win most places in the country Thiel might want to live. Trump lost on the entire west coast, Colorado and NY. He alienated himself and for what? He couldn't even help Trump win CA.
- JumpCrisscross 9y ago> He is personally facing the backlash from openly supporting Trump and being a speaker at his rallies Thiel is moving to Los Angeles, not Louisiana. The amount of PR he’s gotten over his branding decision surrounding this move is mind blowing.
- IntronExon 9y agoUnless he’s paying a PR firm to make it so, which wouldn’t shock many here I suspect. Clearly he’s not concerned about negative press, and this kind of negative press will attract a certain kind of ideologue. It’s all a win for him, as we lose by bickering over the parting words of someone who seems to utterly lack a conscience.
- makewavesnotwar 9y agoPretty sure the PR is a play to politicize his move and paint SV as a brick wall of intolerant liberalism and give the "conservatives" more fuel for their fire just like his speech at the RNC. Still have no idea why he's trying so hard to burn the community that generated his wealth though. Makes one wonder who he's really in bed with now.
- tomcam 9y agoWhy was supporting Trump absurd?
- XJOKOLAT 9y agoGood question, dick head.
- chillwaves 9y agoWhen 60% of the country actively hate the guy, it doesn't make for good business. On a moral level, Trump is literally one of the worst human beings on the planet. Every awful trait you can associate with a person, Trump has it. The dude is a walking billboard for the 7 deadly sins.
- sho 9y ago> On a moral level, Trump is literally one of the worst human beings on the planet Oh come on. I am far from a Trump supporter but this is ludicrous. How many people has he killed? Trump is a horny old silver-spoon doofus with a knack for telling people what they want to hear. I can't stand him but Stalin he ain't.
- superioritycplx 9y agoNo one deported more people than Obama. No one droned more people than Obama.
- wellboy 9y agoHe mean public figure in the western world.
- sho 9y agoHe literally said "literally one of the worst human beings on the planet". I am pretty unsympathetic to any argument that starts with "he meant to say...". I can see what he said, in black and white. I'm going to address that. He can post what "he meant to say" separately.
- raguuu 9y agoyou just proved the point of the article. Thiel had massive balls to support Trump early and publicly. Hats off, it paid out well vv
- unapprovedviews 9y ago> facing the backlash from openly supporting Trump thus further proving the headline
- makewavesnotwar 9y agoThat's a stretch.
- ignoramceisblis 9y ago> Everyone is being alienated everywhere because the country has a leader who is actively polarizing the populous No. That is the fault of mass media corporations (and now, also thinly-veiled "grassroots" organizations). It's quite simple to pick and choose quotes from individuals that can be construed as offensive ("superpredators", anyone? The list goes on), craft a narrative, and put them on the national stage. This is what these organizations do, at the expense of other issues. You will not find a more powerful, more influential reason for the division this country is experiencing. It is these organizations and those who profit from them the most that are most responsible.
- makewavesnotwar 9y agoNo. Trump is creating and repeating his own rhetoric. The mass media corporations aren't making him tweet constantly about the "Dems". Your statements about the media aren't wrong but that doesn't mean that Trump isn't also to blame. He's literally picking fights at every opportunity he gets.