5 ms·

Not sure if you're trolling, but the network is being accessed by bypassing the captive portal. The network is being accessed in a way that isn't permitted.

• gsich 9y ago
  And how should I know that there is a captive portal? I connect (connection is established after receiving IP address!) and use iodine (or similar).
  • tedunangst 9y ago
    I'm sure the jury will be delighted to hear your explanation.
    • gsich 9y ago
      Why should this go to court? I'm not sure if you have understood what this thread was about.
    • loup-vaillant 9y ago
      "I used iodine all the time, so I can't even notice the presence of a captive portal, if any." "My son handles the computer stuff for me, I don't even know about that logging page you're talking about." "I thought restricted networks had a WPA-2 password? That's what they use at my workplace."
      • pbhjpbhj 9y ago
        "The door to the house was open, move of the stuff was tied down, how could i be expected to know I wasn't authorised to use it??" Judges just aren't that stupid.
        • gsich 9y ago
          Only that the comparison is stupid.
        • loup-vaillant 9y ago
          Here's the thing: I never give my real name to captive portals. I don't even give a real email address. Who can tell me with a straight face that this is criminal behaviour
• zb3 9y ago
  So the network is not password protected, DNS (or ICMP) works normally, but somehow using it in a particular way is not permitted? Then why does it work at all?