6 ms·
So is gitkraken. But I assume these apps have spent a considerable amount of time in optimizing electron, which not everyone can do.
by supergreg 9y ago
So is gitkraken.
But I assume these apps have spent a considerable amount of time in optimizing electron, which not everyone can do.
- erikbye 9y agoWhile some may find GitKraken visually pleasing, it can't be used for big repos; didn't even manage to open a few of the ones I tried.
- crispinb 9y agoI was curious as I've never found a standalone visual git client I liked as much as IntelliJ's integrated one. So I downloaded it, found it was 1/4 of a GB and wouldn't look at a local repo without logging in to a web service. Deleted.
- philliphaydon 9y agoIt never used to require logging in but the moment they added that I deleted it.
- friendzis 9y agoSome years ago I was evaluating GUI git clients (the landscape has changed since) for rather simple flows and found SmartGitHg simple enough to setup and explain in under an hour and powerful enough not to drop to a shell. No affiliation here.
- SOLAR_FIELDS 9y agoI still haven't found anything better than IntelliJ's triple column view for resolving merge conflicts. Is there anything similar in a more lightweight editor?
- icebraining 9y agoIf you don't mind having it separate from your main editor, Meld is great.
- SOLAR_FIELDS 9y agoInteresting that this is touted as one of the "best" uses of Meld[0]. Will try this out tomorrow. 0: http://meldmerge.org/help/resolving-conflicts.html http://meldmerge.org/help/resolving-conflicts.html