6 ms·
The author probably exaggerates, but identifies a very valid point. You really don't want to have this kind of confusion about something that you are planning t
by jvdh 10y ago
The author probably exaggerates, but identifies a very valid point. You really don't want to have this kind of confusion about something that you are planning to trust your secrets to.
- Raed667 10y agoThe naming confusion is legitimate (PGP, GPG, openPGP) but it literally takes one Google query "PGP GPG" to answer that question in 30 seconds.
- jvdh 10y agoThe naming of "private key" versus "secring.pgp" is very valid criticism. Also the fact that it crashes on first use, and that it is all not very user-friendly are all valid criticisms (still!). PS. please don't down vote because you disagree.