No, I'm not implying that. I'm implying that I don't understand how his arguments flow - they seem self defeating. For the reasons outlined above. I don't mean

No, I'm not implying that. I'm implying that I don't understand how his arguments flow - they seem self defeating. For the reasons outlined above. I don't mean it personally, and I don't really care if he is respected or not. I just wanna get to the bottom of why, how and what he is getting at. And from his writing style it seem I am led to doubt he doesn't really believe what he is implying. Of course, I might and probqly an wrong so would appreciate clarification. The argument of: its not just propaganda, its also a reflection of development - doesn't wash with me.