5 ms·
> Since there are infinite things about which we are wrong That's... ahem... wrong. How could there possibly be an infinite number of things "we" (humanity, I
by jordan0day 10y ago
> Since there are infinite things about which we are wrong
That's... ahem... wrong.
How could there possibly be an infinite number of things "we" (humanity, I presume?) are wrong about, given that there have only been a finite number of human beings with (as far as I know) finite life spans?
- jcoffland 10y agoIt's quite simple. I am assuming there are an infinite number of things to know. That which we do not know we are wrong about.
- db48x 10y agoThat's not a very good assumption; the universe has a finite size and therefore cannot contain an infinite amount of information.
- jsprogrammer 10y agoThe observable universe appears to have finite size. I don't know how you could prove it though.
- nitrogen 10y agoThe observable universe is effectively defined to be finite in size. The proof comes from the speed of light.
- jcoffland 10y agoAssuming a big bang is the source of all matter. Our observable universe may only be a spec in something much larger with out violating any of our "laws" of physics.
- jcoffland 10y agoAssuming the observable universe is everything there is is not a good assumption.
- szemet 10y agoIf the universe cannot contain infinite amount of information then it follows that there are infinite knowledge we cannot know - simply because we cannot store it anywhere (in brains or computers or anywhere). For example: exact prime factorization of all natural numbers, etc... Of course this is true only if you accept induction. So you can still back off by declaring yourself finitist* ;) * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Finitism https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Finitism