Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
wtdata
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
121.
▲
by
wtdata
7y ago
> In my opinion, minorities in particular have reason to arm themselves and to be prepared to defend themselves if necessary. That's an interesting take, since minorities commit - by very, very far - the greatest amount of violent c
122.
▲
by
wtdata
7y ago
> Dr. Parisi, who spent less than 24 hours in Cancún, was paid $2,700, or three times what he would have received from Medicare This illustrates perfectly the point I (and most everyone on Europe) tries to get to Americans and often they
123.
▲
by
wtdata
7y ago
I know the article says they can connect using Tor. But by reading that paragraph, I couldn't be sure if that allows the distributed hosting to continue working properly, or if it just allows access but defeats the distributed hosting
124.
▲
by
wtdata
7y ago
Well, does the distributed hosting work with TOR? What about with a VPN (like the free one included in Opera)?
125.
▲
by
wtdata
7y ago
Your point logically implies that you are against increasing life conditions of the people that are born poor in those countries with high birth rates.
126.
▲
by
wtdata
7y ago
> meaning you need to dedicate more land to agriculture I don't understand why most people have this wrong idea. In a lot of places, the grazing pastures are naturally occurring, they aren't planted there. It feels like people
127.
▲
by
wtdata
7y ago
Local agriculture won't feed 7 billion people and even worst went the method you are proposing is GMO, fertilizer and pesticide free.
128.
▲
by
wtdata
7y ago
Very well, but why don't these reports ever call for reducing the birthrate in countries where this is exploding [1]? Now they are asking us to stop meat consumption, but the if number of people keeps increasing, what will they ask us
129.
▲
by
wtdata
7y ago
It is pointed out right at the beginning of the wikipedia article that the country was already in a state of civil war. "By October 1862 Emperor Tewodros's position as ruler had become precarious: much of Ethiopia was in revolt ag
130.
▲
by
wtdata
7y ago
> Talk about illiberal and fascist. Or communist, as the article itself mentions.
131.
▲
by
wtdata
7y ago
My bad I misunderstood your answer to my first comment. I understood you were taking about the marketability of the produce, not of the means of production. In any case, that is the reasoning of my second point when originally answering to
132.
▲
by
wtdata
7y ago
> No, it wouldn't, because it is marketable ownership I have to be sincere, I never saw this definition involving marketability anywhere, this is new for me. Perhaps it's really like you say, but that's not the definition
133.
▲
by
wtdata
7y ago
> The idea that "Kurds"[0] are somehow more motivated or more trustworthy is literally just racist State-sponsored propaganda. Kurds aren't a race. Giving special credit to a group of people because of their different cult
134.
▲
by
wtdata
7y ago
> Capitalism describes a social organization where some people (the capitalists) own the means of production whereas most people are working for them. This is not accurate. Capitalism describes a system where people are free to own means
135.
▲
by
wtdata
7y ago
> Of course, i don't have any illusions about how democratic EU is, we just saw it how democratically EC president elected (through a closed auction). The EC is elected by a voting by your elected representatives in the European Par
136.
▲
by
wtdata
7y ago
My comment you were responding to, had absolutely nothing to do with drones. The comment was about perpetually blaming the EU/US for whatever bad happens in 3rd world countries.
137.
▲
by
wtdata
7y ago
> it's only sensible to your satisfaction and to the satisfaction of those who share the same right-wing values, but without hearing the argument of why this is a sensible policy i can assure you that it carries not the slightest co
138.
▲
by
wtdata
7y ago
Please explain how blaming Europe/US for all the problems non western countries face, is "empathy". Because it really looks like "ideology", not like "empathy".
139.
▲
by
wtdata
7y ago
This is the new version of Western Exceptionalism: Everything - bad - that happens in the world, is always fault of Europe or the US. The people that live in those countries, the warlords they support, the wars they fight, the human atrocit
140.
▲
by
wtdata
7y ago
Saving someone that is about to drown, if directly faced with the situation, is clearly a moral (and probably legal) duty. But I world argue, that supporting a solution to actively prevent someone from putting themselves in a situation wher
141.
▲
by
wtdata
7y ago
Well, so far the US only designated China as a currency manipulator. No actual action followed about that designation. My take is that is just a way to pressure China to accept other measures (like increased tariffs) for now.
142.
▲
by
wtdata
7y ago
>As I have tried to show repeatedly, multiple parties can be intolerant. Re-read your original comments then: "The pro-life position of forcing women to not have abortions is indeed intolerant of their rights." "Forcing pe
143.
▲
by
wtdata
7y ago
You are going in a circular argument. Your original words were: "The pro-life position of forcing women to not have abortions is indeed intolerant of their rights." See, you equate "intolerance" with defending to violate
144.
▲
by
wtdata
7y ago
You are effectively arguing that, in Alabama, for instance, since 2 months ago, pro choice are the intolerant ones and pro life are the non intolerant. After all, the law there, says so according to your reasoning. > A can stab B and B c
145.
▲
by
wtdata
7y ago
I think you are missing the point. The point is that you argue that pro life are intolerant because they don't respect woman rights. Well, then, using your argument, in a society where unborn children have rights, the exact same thing
146.
▲
by
wtdata
7y ago
Freedom of speech already existed when society at large was vastly less educated than today.
147.
▲
by
wtdata
7y ago
In the examples you have given, it all comes down to a particular society definition of whom has rights and whom doesn't. Your argument is based on a specific society where law states unborn children have no rights. In a society where
148.
▲
by
wtdata
7y ago
China has an autocratic regimen, it's difficult to gather what the population there truly thinks about US trade tariffs, when they all pretend they never even heard about Tianamen.
149.
▲
by
wtdata
7y ago
I am wondering what does this mean (if anything) to the huge amount of US public debt that China holds.
150.
▲
by
wtdata
7y ago
Capuccino has milk in it.
More ›