Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
usrbinbash
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
151.
▲
by
usrbinbash
2y ago
What's the plan for preventing the statically charged, microabrasive lunar dust from destroying every piece of unshielded equipment?
152.
▲
by
usrbinbash
2y ago
> The Moon is a natural vacuum. The moon is also naturally covered in microabrasive, statically charged dust, that will happily annihilate any piece of equipment we put there, that is more complex than a lunar rover from the early 70s, i
153.
▲
by
usrbinbash
2y ago
> But again, I can use this to justify anything. No, you cannot. To use your above example, I very much doubt that anyone has a workable plan to prove the existence of biblical angels that they could formulate in enough reason and techni
154.
▲
by
usrbinbash
2y ago
> You never quantified the LHC’s benefit. Correct, because it takes about 2 seconds to google it. [Here you go](0) [0]: https://cerncourier.com/a/a-decade-in-lhc-publications/
155.
▲
by
usrbinbash
2y ago
thing := Thing{...} other_thing := thing pinter_to_same_thing := &thing ALL types in go are being copied by value. There is no such thing as a "reference" in this language. Even a slice or map is just a small
156.
▲
by
usrbinbash
2y ago
Yes, they are, and that's precisely why we use computers and deterministic code for many tasks instead of people.
157.
▲
by
usrbinbash
2y ago
What for? What exactly is gained by having "more visualization"? Gentle reminder that this isn't a new idea either. Remember UML diagrams? Id do, mostly for how useless they were when it came to actually doing good architectu
158.
▲
by
usrbinbash
2y ago
Alright, lets compare expenditures. The LHC cost around 4.75 bn (initial estimate) to construct. Let's be generous and add quite some buffer, to a solid 6bn. The project has been in operation since 2010. Lets assume operational cost of
159.
▲
by
usrbinbash
2y ago
> But why do people keep coming back to visual programming? Because real programming languages are free. That's it. That's the main reason. Sure, there are hobby projects, yes, but almost every visual "programming language
160.
▲
by
usrbinbash
2y ago
If this is the goal, then please tell me how the tool achieves it: What exactly is simpler to manage or deploy by using `viking` as opposed to ssh-config and ssh, and in what regard is it simpler?
161.
▲
by
usrbinbash
2y ago
> How about putting different hosts into groups, and then running a command on the group so that every machine in the group runs the same command? That can be done with a simple awk/fzf script, which would even allow me to interacti
162.
▲
by
usrbinbash
2y ago
That's why ssh config allows setting up alias names for servers.
163.
▲
by
usrbinbash
2y ago
> as someone who dislikes config files to an extreme degree This tool has a config as well. From the repos readme: Viking saves data locally. Set VIKING_CONFIG_DIR env variable for a custom directory. Use viking config to check the
164.
▲
by
usrbinbash
2y ago
Question: What is the specific advantage I get from using $ viking machine add --name deathstar --key starkey 168.112.216.50 $ viking exec --tty deathstar /bin/bash Over putting the following in my ~/.ssh/co
165.
▲
by
usrbinbash
2y ago
> Online games that aren't sold as services (like WoW with a subscription) wouldn't need to work online or with servers. Absolutely agree, but fact is, games which rely on a centralized server architecture for the actual purpos
166.
▲
by
usrbinbash
2y ago
> Lets say that somehow this requirement ( 'reasonable playable state' ) was mandated. It would likely result in more modular architecture. I call that a win. It would also raise the cost of development, and raise the barrier o
167.
▲
by
usrbinbash
2y ago
Someone please define "reasonable playable state". Because, for something like an MMORPG, "playable" means being able to run a server. So, what does "playable" entail? Source and internal sysops documentation?
168.
▲
by
usrbinbash
2y ago
Bird may be another Bird.
169.
▲
by
usrbinbash
2y ago
> If you’ve used CoPilot in VSCode, you understand the satisfaction of feeling like an LLM is thinking one step ahead of you That "satisfaction" vanished pretty damn quickly, once I realised that I have often more work correcti
170.
▲
by
usrbinbash
2y ago
from timetravel import Delorean d = Delorean(color="SILVER") if d.power_gw >= 1.21: d.flux_compensator.charge() print("Great Scott!")
171.
▲
by
usrbinbash
2y ago
Alright, now I'm curious. How do I "undo", say, `rm ./temp/*.txt`
172.
▲
by
usrbinbash
2y ago
> like allowing manual code edits That's just another escape hatch tbh. Don't get me wrong, if the system actually allows me to define what some of them call "code blocks", "logic blocks", or whatever, where
173.
▲
by
usrbinbash
2y ago
> But why do people keep coming back to visual programming? Because real programming languages are free. That's it. That's the main reason. Sure, there are hobby projects, yes, but almost every visual "programming language
174.
▲
by
usrbinbash
2y ago
> The point of abstraction is to limit blast radius of requirement changes. No, the point of abstraction is to make things easier to handle. At least that is the original meaning of the term, before the OOP ideology got its hands on it
175.
▲
by
usrbinbash
2y ago
> you should never, ever build abstractions until you actually need them. This should be put on the cover of every programming textbook, in very bold, very red, letters. Right next to: "Measure before you optimize" and "Co
176.
▲
by
usrbinbash
2y ago
> Imagine the most annoying possible client of our microservice. Suppose they want a new field, and they insist that it be named a certain way. Then I tell the client that I sent him the API specification 2 months ago. If he isn't h
177.
▲
by
usrbinbash
2y ago
The problem I have with such tools, is interoperability. This transpiles into Python. Okay. So for this to work in a collaborative environment, EVERYONE working on the code has to use it. Given how popular python is, and the natural inertia
178.
▲
by
usrbinbash
2y ago
Many of the most dangerous threat actors simply don't care about getting caught. They are operated, financed and protected by nation states, and/or operate from geopolitical locations where law enforcement is lacking.
179.
▲
by
usrbinbash
2y ago
Why is there a fire department in almost every city block?!
180.
▲
by
usrbinbash
2y ago
> This new SSH feature isn’t intended to solve enterprise-level problems. But service level security features have the potential to cause enterprise-level problems. Sure, in an ideal world, all admins would always make zero mistakes. A
More ›