Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
treesciencebot
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
11 ms
·
211.
▲
by
treesciencebot
3y ago
> It's a proprietary versus open source argument. You can build a mk4 clone for much less than the price of a Prusa-branded one, as everything is open source. The higher price tag is like a donation to open source. I would say the h
212.
▲
by
treesciencebot
3y ago
Indeed. I always thought they deferred the launch of any new model after X1C in order to take the true "just works" crown back (with the hopes of it would be something like Intel/AMD feuds where the monopoly had finally came
213.
▲
Raytracing on AMD’s RDNA 2/3, and Nvidia’s Turing and Pascal
(chipsandcheese.com)
100 points
by
treesciencebot
3y ago
|
31 comments
214.
▲
Intel's chief dGPU architect departs to start a new generative AI company
(phoronix.com)
1 points
by
treesciencebot
3y ago
|
0 comments
215.
▲
Linux 6.4 AMD Graphics Driver Picking Up New Power Features for the Steam Deck
(phoronix.com)
6 points
by
treesciencebot
4y ago
|
0 comments
216.
▲
by
treesciencebot
4y ago
Intel must feel pretty bad about messing up the whole chiplet thing since that advantage allowed AMD to overthrow them in just under a couple of years. And it seems like they still seem to be adjusting into it since compared to Zen 4 SKUs,
217.
▲
by
treesciencebot
4y ago
I wonder whether the upcoming APUs will feature 3D cache. Assuming it server pretty well in a gaming scenario (and more so when the CPU and GPU is sharing the same memory bandwith) it should be a pretty clear win. And since these chips are
218.
▲
AMD's Zen 4 I/O Die Shot Analysis (From the Isscc Presentation)
(techpowerup.com)
2 points
by
treesciencebot
4y ago
|
0 comments
219.
▲
by
treesciencebot
4y ago
2 x 32GB ECC UDIMM DDR5-4800 RAM is going around for ~280$ here (including a %20 VAT, so I'd assume it would be a little bit cheaper in the states). Not really unreasonable considering regular DIMMs (albeit with higher speeds like 6000
220.
▲
by
treesciencebot
4y ago
I was also really curious about Linux benchmarks; and seems like Phoronix, a Linux-centric tech review outlet, also released their own reviews with tons of game and productivity benchmarks running on the latest kernel. https://ww
221.
▲
by
treesciencebot
4y ago
Yes [1]! IIRC the iGPU is located in the I/O die [2] which is pretty much the same in all their consumer SKUs (so I don't expect any changes in either memory controller or the iGPU for their X3D models). [1]: https://ww
222.
▲
AMD releases a new flagship CPU for consumer market with 128M of L3 Cache
(techpowerup.com)
230 points
by
treesciencebot
4y ago
|
208 comments
223.
▲
Zen 4 X3D is great – but has one Big Problem
(youtube.com)
1 points
by
treesciencebot
4y ago
|
0 comments
224.
▲
by
treesciencebot
4y ago
As someone who only needs raw CPU single-thread power when waiting for an executable to link (while using a stock linker for rust and taking a release build takes minutes, which is not much time but also a lot of time), I wonder whether I s
225.
▲
by
treesciencebot
5y ago
It will probably be post 3.0, since the underlying HTTP interface we use ( https://pypi.org/project/requests ) does not support HTTP/2. We are currently discussing how to migrate from that to something like httpx, w
226.
▲
by
treesciencebot
5y ago
(HTTPie maintainer here) You might be in luck since Nested JSON support is going to be star feature of our upcoming release. Here is a sneak peek: $ http --offline --print=B pie.dev/post \ search[type]=client \ search[stars]:=5
227.
▲
by
treesciencebot
5y ago
Thanks! Glad you liked it.
228.
▲
Show HN: Teyit – Automatically format your Python unittest assertions
(github.com)
8 points
by
treesciencebot
5y ago
|
2 comments
229.
▲
Show HN: Static Frame Dependency Graphs with Python
(github.com)
5 points
by
treesciencebot
5y ago
|
0 comments
230.
▲
by
treesciencebot
5y ago
Extra clarification: I'm well aware the concerns about tokens vs CST vs AST, that is why I decided to write down a library that does refactors on small code fragments rather than just unparse()ing everything. CST is definitely more sou
231.
▲
by
treesciencebot
5y ago
Thanks for the suggestion though just want to clarify, I am also one of the maintainers of parso :-) (and also the ast module in the standard library)
232.
▲
by
treesciencebot
5y ago
It would probably be better if you can just write a typescript parser, and then you can transpile type script AST directly to Python AST and use ast.unparse() without any additional libraries.
233.
▲
by
treesciencebot
5y ago
Indeed! I also would suggest people to use a CST implementation (parso / LibCST) instead of refactor if they intend do large scale refactors, but from what I can see in my previous attempts (e.g teyit, a unittest assertion formatter) w
234.
▲
by
treesciencebot
5y ago
I haven't used bowler, but from what I can see it is using lib2to3 (through fissix), which can't parse newer Python code (parenthesized context managers, new pattern matching statement etc.) due to it being using a LL(1) parser. T
235.
▲
by
treesciencebot
5y ago
Yes! I love to do transformations with lib2to3, but unfortunately it is now deprecated. As I've stated in the README, for complex refactorings I also would personally prefer working with CST (probably through parso instead of regular l
236.
▲
by
treesciencebot
5y ago
Author of this project here (and also a CPython core developer FWIW), for many aspects (including the AST) PyPy follows CPython closely even on implementation details so `refactor` would probably work out of the box once PyPy releases 3.9 (
237.
▲
Show HN: Python Source Code Refactoring Toolkit via AST
(github.com)
110 points
by
treesciencebot
5y ago
|
33 comments
238.
▲
by
treesciencebot
5y ago
This has been brought up: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/26264#discussion_r640... Though personally I would dislike this, since every time somebody mentioned about type hints they commented on the pro
239.
▲
Should we say stop to the syntactical growth of Python?
(tree.science)
3 points
by
treesciencebot
6y ago
|
0 comments