sumedh

6 ms·

31.
by sumedh 2mo ago
> Google acting like a normal but competent company I am just waiting for the 10 AI models or Chatbot Apps competing with one another like the 10 messenger Apps.
32.
by sumedh 2mo ago
> Now they have their own chips I never understood that argument, are you saying Chinese companies are not going to build their own chips if they get access to Nvidia chips?
33.
by sumedh 2mo ago
> Although that's probably more due to Microsoft's aggressive behavior recently. The current US govt might have played a role as well.
34.
by sumedh 2mo ago
OpenAI should have just focussed on Coding instead of wasting time with Sora.
35.
by sumedh 2mo ago
Ant is not giving lot of gifts though :(
36.
by sumedh 2mo ago
> Google did this by creating Android to undercut Apple. Android was created to compete with Blackberry, Google then acquired Android.
37.
by sumedh 2mo ago
Now you know why we have artificial intelligence, most of human intelligence is predictable and can be copied.
38.
by sumedh 2mo ago
> Apple's not so unethical Apple colluded with other companies to suppress wages.
39.
by sumedh 2mo ago
> It seems to be a common trait of the AI people to just brazenly violate the law. Isnt Apple part of the same group, doesnt Apple collude with other companies to suppress wages?
40.
by sumedh 2mo ago
If the CEO goes not care about ethics why should the employees?
41.
by sumedh 2mo ago
Cloudflare can verify certain bots when they come from known ip addresses. So if your site is using cloudflare it can let CCBot if it has done the verification.
42.
by sumedh 2mo ago
> Xi Jinping rose to power on a message of anti-corruption Just like Trump and Modi
43.
by sumedh 3mo ago
> Seniors should be paid to actively introduce juniors Instead lets train the contractors of an IT sourcing company and then we don't need you.
44.
by sumedh 3mo ago
AI companies say people will buy intelligence like they buy electricity.
45.
by sumedh 3mo ago
Because they know it will not work.
46.
by sumedh 3mo ago
Elon bought and Amodei and Sunder are using it now. So Altman was right, his bet paid off.
47.
by sumedh 3mo ago
> And even Claude Code can be setup to use non-Anthropic models. Too much friction though, with Cursor its out of the box.
48.
by sumedh 3mo ago
Interesting, will give it a try again, thanks.
49.
by sumedh 3mo ago
In my experience these models (glm 5.1) struggle after 100K tokens.
50.
by sumedh 3mo ago
> short sided leadership in the US that basically traded our knowledge, design and manufacturing knowledge for cheap of shoring The shareholders and execs got rich, you are not rewarded for very long term performance so why bother thinki
51.
by sumedh 3mo ago
Who defines what is public good?
52.
by sumedh 3mo ago
> but the soul & humanity of their skill is gone. If robots make life saving surgery cheaper so that many people can afford it, isnt that a good thing?
53.
by sumedh 3mo ago
> I believe it's on you to understand it. This is exactly why Google has 10 messenger Apps.
54.
by sumedh 3mo ago
I wonder if he is using Anthropic's claude code to work on his Anthropic Github account.
55.
by sumedh 4mo ago
No that is not true, Google didn't release it because they feared it would kill their search business, nothing to do with safety.
56.
by sumedh 4mo ago
Didnt Google start the race with their paper?
57.
by sumedh 4mo ago
> "4.6 was such a bad model," It's just amusing reading all these posts with different viewpoints, just in this thread there are multiple people saying 4.6 was so much better than 4.7 and that they switched back to 4.6.
58.
by sumedh 4mo ago
Yes but Anthropic made a deal with SpaceX and increase usage limits by 50%, so you might not hit your limits.
59.
by sumedh 4mo ago
Can confirm what others have posted, i tried some random snacks/sweets in some of the 711 stores in Japan and they were really good, for some reason I was not expecting it to be so good.
60.
by sumedh 4mo ago
> Money goes to the person who can hoodwink people into thinking their product will do something they care about So Google, MS, FB, OpenAI could not "hoodwink" people?

More ›