Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
staticautomatic
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
8 ms
·
421.
▲
by
staticautomatic
4y ago
I’ve found the easiest way to push back is to explain the very real risk of getting blacklisted. In the US, the law is basically inconsequential because there’s no private right of action (an individual can’t sue you for spamming them).
422.
▲
by
staticautomatic
4y ago
“White man” is popular example. “Asian” also works depending on the context.
423.
▲
by
staticautomatic
4y ago
What is a packet?
424.
▲
by
staticautomatic
4y ago
FYI I down-voted you because making a bare assertion and then saying “prove me wrong” is hostile and intellectually lazy.
425.
▲
by
staticautomatic
4y ago
No, my recollection was that methanol is metabolized into something which “pickles” you but I may well be wrong.
426.
▲
by
staticautomatic
4y ago
My recollection is that accumulation of aldehyde is also the danger of consuming methanol.
427.
▲
by
staticautomatic
4y ago
Fair enough, but anyone who’s been around the block on crisis communications knows that you’re supposed to hit the big red “stop all regular communications until we get a fucking handle on this” button.
428.
▲
by
staticautomatic
4y ago
A problem in what sense?
429.
▲
by
staticautomatic
4y ago
I find it super helpful in applied social science research.
430.
▲
by
staticautomatic
4y ago
I encountered this once and was just sooooo confused when they got to the part about how the mentor had helped them make all this money and achieve all these life goals. I was like, “and so now you’re…hustling people at a Starbucks in Vacav
431.
▲
by
staticautomatic
4y ago
It's interesting that you bring up the egg. It reminds me of one day in my cell biology class in undergrad when we talked about why there are even eggs and sperm at all. I remember it only vaguely but I think maybe it was something abo
432.
▲
by
staticautomatic
4y ago
That makes sense, though it’s hard for me to imagine a reasonable finding they don’t apply given the state public policy justification.
433.
▲
by
staticautomatic
4y ago
State court claims can and regularly are brought in federal court because federal courts have authority to hear state law cases. It’s Civil Procedure 101. Counter-claims which arise from the same operative facts must be brought or else th
434.
▲
by
staticautomatic
4y ago
What do you mean by “apply to”? It sounds like a run of the mill compulsory counterclaim.
435.
▲
by
staticautomatic
4y ago
You’d first move to dismiss for failure to state a claim, and perhaps counter-sue under anti-SLAPP.
436.
▲
by
staticautomatic
4y ago
“ Failure to make it prominent should be ground for voiding critical clauses.” In the US it typically is.
437.
▲
by
staticautomatic
4y ago
What’s especially scary is the possibility that any employee whose credentials are stolen may be investigated for conspiracy.
438.
▲
by
staticautomatic
5y ago
It comes from the privatization of government-run businesses during the fall of the Soviet Union.
439.
▲
by
staticautomatic
5y ago
I’m a competent Python programmer and am currently using PowerAutomate at work because Sharepoint. You know what’s scary about it? I can’t really write tests. My non-technical team understands why this is a problem, but it would never have
440.
▲
by
staticautomatic
5y ago
Dramatiq is great.
441.
▲
by
staticautomatic
5y ago
Really the story is this reply thread: https://mobile.twitter.com/janedvidek/status/149872324818338...
442.
▲
by
staticautomatic
5y ago
It’s a stick the Russian people will have to wield so long as the Russian government has nukes.
443.
▲
by
staticautomatic
5y ago
I wonder if you could shadow ban the videos, like by spoofing a page only the uploader can see.
444.
▲
by
staticautomatic
5y ago
Honest question: what about plastic and other non-fuel uses?
445.
▲
by
staticautomatic
5y ago
Perhaps this could be accomplished by making them front or insure the cost of the expected liability — being at least the cost of removing unsupported devices.
446.
▲
by
staticautomatic
5y ago
It’s hard for me to understand how holding people to account for sponsoring genocides means holding them to an impossible standard of moral purity. This strikes me as a straw man.
447.
▲
by
staticautomatic
5y ago
He’s pretty good as presidents who sponsored genocides go (East Timor, for those who don’t know).
448.
▲
by
staticautomatic
5y ago
Making a “new” Workday account thing for each company using Workday is also the worst. Easy Apply and Greenhouse FTW.
449.
▲
by
staticautomatic
5y ago
It's complex, but I'll try to explain it succinctly. For starters, this is about civil lawsuits (e.g. suing your employer for money because they caused or allowed sexual assault or harassment in the workplace). As a general matter
450.
▲
by
staticautomatic
5y ago
Yeah but even that era is over now. The last time I saw a lawyer using Word Perfect it was a DOJ office maybe 8-10 years ago.
More ›