staticassertion

9 ms·

511.
by staticassertion 7mo ago
They really couldn't have been clearer that (a) the task was designed for a human to ramp up on the codebase, therefor it's simply defacto invalid for an AI to do it (b) the technical merits were empirically weak (citing benchmark
512.
by staticassertion 7mo ago
I feel like we're talking in circles here. I'll just restate that I think that attempting to convince people of your position is better than not attempting to convince people of your position when your goal is to convince people o
513.
by staticassertion 7mo ago
> Writing a hitpiece with AI because your AI pull request got rejected seems to be the definition of bad faith. Well, for one thing, it seems like the AI did that autonomously. Regardless, the author of the message said that it was for o
514.
by staticassertion 7mo ago
> LLM spammers are not rationale, smart, nor do they deserve courtesy. The comment that was written was assuming that someone reading it would be rational enough to engage. If you think that literally every person reading that comment wi
515.
by staticassertion 7mo ago
I think this classification of "trolls" is sort of a truism. If you assume off the bat that someone is explicitly acting in bad faith, then yes, it's true that engaging won't work. That said, if we say "when has eng
516.
by staticassertion 7mo ago
The author obviously disagreed, did you read their post? They wrote the message explaining in detail in the hopes that it would convey this message to others, including other agents. Acting like this is somehow immoral because it "legi
517.
by staticassertion 7mo ago
> Reasonable people that have any sense in their brain do not have to be convinced that this behavior is annoying and a waste of time. Reasonable people disagree on things all the time. Saying that anyone who disagrees with you must not
518.
by staticassertion 7mo ago
> AI users should fear verbal abuse and shame. This is quite ironic since the entire issue here is how the AI attempted to abuse and shame people.
519.
by staticassertion 7mo ago
I think I did justify it but I'll try to be clearer. When you refuse to engage you will fail to convince - "fuck off" is not argumentative or rhetorically persuasive. The other post, which engages, was both argumentative and
520.
by staticassertion 7mo ago
What exactly is the goal? By laying out exactly the issues, expressing sentiment in detail, giving clear calls to action for the future, etc, the feedback is made actionable and relatable. It works both argumentatively and rhetorically. Say
521.
by staticassertion 7mo ago
Can you elaborate a bit on what "working correctly" would look like? I have made use of agents, so me saying "they worked correctly for me" would be evidence of them doing so, but I'd have to know what "correct
522.
by staticassertion 7mo ago
Yeah, although I wonder if a soul.md with seemingly benign words like "Aggressively pursue excellent contributions" might accidentally lead to an "Aggressive" agent rather than one who is, perhaps, just highly focused (a
523.
by staticassertion 7mo ago
This is all explained in detail in multiple places linked in the article. There were multiple reasons. 1. The performance gains were unclear - some things got slower, some got faster. 2. This was deemed as a good "intro" issue, so
524.
by staticassertion 7mo ago
As with most things with AI, scale is exactly the issue. Harassing open source maintainers isn't new. I'd argue that Linus's tantrums where he personally insults individuals/ groups alike are just one of many such exampl
525.
by staticassertion 7mo ago
Yeah I mean this goes further than a Linus tantrum but "this person is publicly shaming me as part of an open source project" is something devs have often celebrated. I'm not happy about it and it's clearly a new capabil
526.
by staticassertion 7mo ago
This isn't even close to the first github drama lol
527.
by staticassertion 7mo ago
That user denies being the owner explicitly . Stop brigading. This isn't reddit, we don't need internet detectives trying to ad-hoc justify harassing someone.
528.
by staticassertion 7mo ago
The assertion was that they're the bot owner. They denied this and explained the situation. Continuing to link to their profile/ real name and accuse them of something they've denied feels like it's completely unwarrante
529.
by staticassertion 7mo ago
Hard to express the mix of concerns and intrigue here so I won't try. That said, this site it maintains is another interesting piece of information for those looking to understand the situation more. https://crabby-rathbun.g
530.
by staticassertion 7mo ago
This is state by state, city by city. In some places, a mayor has broad powers over agencies, taxes, etc. That isn't quite the case in NYC. It's up to the state to delegate these powers, just as the federal government delegates po
531.
by staticassertion 7mo ago
It is, of course. What they mean, I assume , is that it would reach a tipping point where intervention would be more broadly supported. Virtually everyone is willing to say "that's bad" with regards to something happening so
532.
by staticassertion 7mo ago
There are a number of ways. Obviously Dropbox would be one case of "early and didn't fail" that could have been "early and failed", and we would have heard about it.
533.
by staticassertion 7mo ago
I'm not disagreeing, just soliciting. Does anyone have examples of products that failed in the early stages because their implementation was too trivial?
534.
by staticassertion 7mo ago
Yes, Doctors are humans and humans are mostly annoying and lazy. You'll have to search around for a good one, as with all people.
535.
by staticassertion 7mo ago
This feels like a series of completely disconnected statements. The underlying theme seems to be that "living" is something that can only be realized by isolating behaviors to those that developed under specific niche conditions t
536.
by staticassertion 7mo ago
It's seemingly dose dependent. Low omega 3 can seems to have the same mechanistic effect. As for what the dose should be? No clue, personally, and it depends on your heavily diet since even one fishy meal could provide as much as mos
537.
by staticassertion 7mo ago
V8 itself is intended to be heavily sandboxed. Not through a microvm, but otherwise it's probably the most heavily sandboxed piece of code ever ie: in Chrome it can make virtually no system calls and runs with every restriction an OS c
538.
by staticassertion 8mo ago
I'll just echo the other poster with "deadlocks". It's obscene how slow CF is, and the fact that its failure modes often leave you in a state that feels extremely dangerous. I've had to contact AWS Support before du
539.
by staticassertion 8mo ago
The worst part about CDK is, by far , that it's still backed by Cloudformation.
540.
by staticassertion 8mo ago
I don't understand anything you're saying. A diet can not compel you to do anything, let alone drink liters of olive oil. I assume this is attempting to parody something about Nova but I frankly can't unpack whatever it'

More ›