stale2002

13 ms·

31.
by stale2002 2mo ago
> people are fearful that the entirety of the internet has been hoovered up Information wants to be free. If you don't like the idea of information, ideas, ect being shared freely for anyone to use just say that. But you aren&#x27
32.
by stale2002 2mo ago
No, being a cyberpunk is not about having some authoritarian control that prevents other people from using technology. Instead it is about empowering the masses. It's about being a rag tag hacker fighting to do stuff that other people
33.
by stale2002 2mo ago
Actually yes they are. Code has been determined to be protected speech.
34.
by stale2002 2mo ago
You have misunderstood my statement. I am saying that someone else would use that output to create or improve a different model. I think you could have figured out that this was the meaning of my statement instead of doing the irrelevant n
35.
by stale2002 2mo ago
> I suppose you think that model providers are not allowed to impose restrictions on the use of their model They should have exactly the same ability to "restrict" it is as the writer of a book on those who read the book that w
36.
by stale2002 2mo ago
> But what will they claim? Copyright infringement obviously. > DOES NOT make a derivative for the purposes of copyright Or maybe you have misunderstood the ruling and thats why the stocks of these companies hasn't plunged. See
37.
by stale2002 2mo ago
Ok, but only if you also conceed that all of these AI companies were stealing to train their models in the first place. Either everyone was stealing all along, and they should all be sued out of existence, or nobody is stealing. Personall
38.
by stale2002 2mo ago
If your definition of VC is "Literally anything that requires a long term investment of money" then sure, but I think most people mean something different than that.
39.
by stale2002 2mo ago
What do you mean, I thought it was fun. Feel free to not make your own music videos, but I am not sure why you would be so upset about other people having fun.
40.
by stale2002 2mo ago
I'm surprised that the Author has missed a very important corollary to the diffusion of "genius theft" that they are bringing up. And that is the diffusion of the beneficiaries. Maybe they think that OpenAI and Anthropic are
41.
by stale2002 3mo ago
The people saying that jobs will all go away because of technology have been wrong every single year, up to this year as well. The burden of proof seems like it's actually on you to show why this current tech boom is any different from
42.
by stale2002 3mo ago
Seeing as we are talking about it now, it seems like they were right that it is interesting to the public. I am not sure why you think social media attention needs to be gate kept.
43.
by stale2002 3mo ago
Journalists are meant to report on the news. This sounds like an interesting piece of science/news to me.
44.
by stale2002 3mo ago
Counter protesting people who are destroying a community seems like a perfectly laudable goal to me. He certainly wasn't expecting to have to shoot someone, but that's the case for most examples of self defense.
45.
by stale2002 3mo ago
No it's not unintuitive. Just like I can learn from a book and nobody can make that illegal, so can other people transformative do the same with computers. Fair use is fair use.
46.
by stale2002 3mo ago
> So, why all this "effort" to protect the model? Because it's their model and business and they are free to use the free market to do exactly that? That's their free market rights too. If you don't like it, use
47.
by stale2002 3mo ago
If it was illegal to go somewhere "lookin for trouble" I think that you would see a whole lot of people arrested from certain groups that you likely wouldn't want to be in prison.
48.
by stale2002 3mo ago
Almost nobody is covered by non compete agreements. And if you think you are, you should just ignore it anyway. They are often both illegal and unenforced. Your old employer isn't going to waste time hiring a private detective to track
49.
by stale2002 3mo ago
Well it would be anyone that has access to a datacenter to run them. Which is a ton of companies. And those companies will rent out access to those models. And if they do something stupid to screw over consumers, well the whole point is
50.
by stale2002 3mo ago
I am sorry to be the one to tell you but it was already the case that you cannot trust LLMs to solve all your problems 100% of the time. It was always random. This is no different than any other randomness that already exists in LLMS. If yo
51.
by stale2002 3mo ago
Of course you can trust them. Just do benchmarks yourself on the new model and decide if it is valuable for your usecase, even with the supposed nerfing. Benchmarks are benchmarks. And you can ignore the data at your own risk.
52.
by stale2002 3mo ago
They are actually designated as a terrorist organization by a very large number of countries. Almost every country in that region does, and around the world. Also, they do all sorts of things. The big one was contributing to the deaths man
53.
by stale2002 3mo ago
There are not large 40 thousand plus armed terrorists groups that have been being armed for decades and have been shooting rockets at Israel for years in either Jordan or Egypt. And Syria has significantly improved their relations with Isr
54.
by stale2002 3mo ago
> The western nations that enabled this genocide and colonialist project can take in those who leave. The much much more likely situation is that a third of gazans leave based on plans that western governments have made for gaza that are
55.
by stale2002 3mo ago
> This is yet another reason why they must be quickly stopped. Nuclear weapons are meant to stop countries from being destroyed, for every country that has thems. Thats why countries get those nuclear weapons in the first place. To use
56.
by stale2002 3mo ago
> Fear is not equivalent to zionism. Saying that it's a bad idea to destroy Israel absolutely is Zionist. It's accepting that Israel will exist and attempts to destroy it should not be enacted. In this case, because of the nucl
57.
by stale2002 3mo ago
> they will not be able to sustain themselves A nuclear armed country wouldn't go down without a fight. I'm also not sure who is even left to do anything about Israel. The entirety of Gaza is rubble and southern Lebanon is soon
58.
by stale2002 3mo ago
Having opinions on where tax dollars go has little do to with someone advocating for destroying an entire nuclearly armed country. Basically nobody in the USA wants it do that.
59.
by stale2002 3mo ago
> Try open sourcing a code base that is built up over the last 15 years and most of the devs no longer work there. Thats what you’re asking for many online games. Thats pretty easy actually. All you have to do is go into the setting page
60.
by stale2002 3mo ago
Of course it's true. Israel has 200+ nuclear weapons. Most people aren't stupid enough to think that trying to destroy a country with 200+ nuclear weapons is a good idea. If they understand this simply idea, that makes them a zion

More ›