Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
rsstack
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
8 ms
·
301.
▲
by
rsstack
5y ago
This law has nothing to do with intermarriage for Jews. That's effectively prohibited by other existing laws. This law tries to prevent Muslims and Christians living in non-annexed occupied territories from marrying other Muslims and C
302.
▲
by
rsstack
5y ago
This law has existed in different variations since 2002. This law is often challenged at Israel's Supreme Court, but the racist parties usually can get a majority vote in the Parliament to "tweak it" every time to get a few m
303.
▲
by
rsstack
5y ago
Whenever I'm traveling abroad I set my phone & laptop default search engine to DuckDuckGo. The worse search results (sorry, but yes) are at least in English...
304.
▲
by
rsstack
5y ago
Russia is 4 km from the US :) "Oklahoma to Krasnoyarsky Krai" makes sense mathematically but is a weird claim to make.
305.
▲
by
rsstack
5y ago
The distance really confused me. I got a distance of 4,353 km between a guess and the answer - which is what you get from Google, but now what you'd say from looking at a map. Border-to-border they are only 250 km apart.
306.
▲
by
rsstack
5y ago
Not to be negative, but when evaluating financial services CryptAPI are failing most checks: - Three employees on LinkedIn, none with a background in finance, security, accounting, etc. - No audited security certifications (PCI DSS doesn&#x
307.
▲
by
rsstack
5y ago
> Our pricing is pay-as-you-go based on the volume of events we store and the revenue we help our customers generate. That means we get to dogfood our own software for usage-based billing! So what is your pricing? The website says "
308.
▲
by
rsstack
5y ago
From Wikipedia: A Ponzi scheme (/ˈpɒnzi/, Italian: [ˈpontsi]) is a form of fraud that lures investors and pays profits to earlier investors with funds from more recent investors.[1] The scheme leads victims to believe that profits
309.
▲
by
rsstack
5y ago
> MS was a supplier to the companies that made and sold computers. They got in trouble for messing with other suppliers. Isn't this only true for the US antitrust case? IIRC the EU antitrust case was similar Apple's situation.
310.
▲
by
rsstack
5y ago
> doesn't allow it's services to be used against the interests of the Israeli state All countries have export laws to prevent local companies from using their services and products against the country's interests.
311.
▲
by
rsstack
5y ago
Check out how Erlang/Elixir/BEAM deal with this. Stateful processes write a state-migration function that's run (new code, old state) when hot reloading the process. Requires some forethought, especially when processes can be
312.
▲
by
rsstack
5y ago
Not really. They're claiming that it isn't the _user_ that's scribbling on the HTML page, which is why their HTML (their customers' HTML specifically) is different from books. Perhaps it would have limited libraries from
313.
▲
by
rsstack
5y ago
You're right and I apologize. I replied to you hastily.
314.
▲
by
rsstack
5y ago
That's between you and your accountant (and if caught: lawyer). I don't see an issue with the IRS attempting to enforce the law.
315.
▲
by
rsstack
5y ago
First, many of them aren't cash only. Second, a single enforcement mechanism of the IRS isn't supposed to catch all infractions. The IRS, and other federal and state agencies, have other mechanisms than asking Venmo to report tran
316.
▲
by
rsstack
5y ago
People don't like to acknowledge the difference between tax evasion and tax avoidance. Amazon always avoided taxes, which was legal and is still legal. The neighbor kid often evaded taxes, which was illegal and is still illegal - just
317.
▲
by
rsstack
5y ago
That's not what he said. It doesn't matter which party wins. The issue would be if representatives of any party end democracy, which he outlined in short how it could be done - and some of the representatives of the "other pa
318.
▲
by
rsstack
5y ago
That "or" wasn't meant as "both" or to opine on which one it is. I personally believe the way Google operate Chrome is one of the reasons it is all but impossible to seriously compete with Google Search. But I'
319.
▲
by
rsstack
5y ago
The anti-competitive argument here isn't that Chrome would be a good competitor to Google Search, but that Google operates both products in a way that makes it all but impossible for other companies to create viable competitors to Chro
320.
▲
by
rsstack
5y ago
> Please don't complain about tangential annoyances—things like article or website formats, name collisions, or back-button breakage. They're too common to be interesting. https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidel
321.
▲
by
rsstack
5y ago
This incident has nothing to do with (a)(2) as Marak didn't _access_ any system. The only sections violated are (a)(5) (_knowingly damaging_ a system) and, arguably, (a)(7) (extortion). (a)(7) is a lot harder to argue though as his ext
322.
▲
by
rsstack
5y ago
The precedent doesn't apply. The SCOTUS interpreted (and in effect, defined) that the "authorized access" in 18 U.S.C. § 1030(a)(2) can't be qualified and limited to less access. If I'm authorized to see usernames,
323.
▲
by
rsstack
5y ago
Did you see the commit before it was deleted? I'd love to see a lawyer claiming anything else.
324.
▲
by
rsstack
5y ago
If we're honest about the US justice system, this would be a subjective decision decided by non-technological lawyers, jurors, and judges. The purposeful malicious intent is working hard against his stance.
325.
▲
by
rsstack
5y ago
"18 U.S.C. § 1030(a)(5)(A) knowingly causes the transmission of a program, information, code, or command, and as a result of such conduct, intentionally causes damage without authorization, to a protected computer;"
326.
▲
by
rsstack
5y ago
I'll leave it as an exercise for the reader to understand the difference between "I am not liable if I have a bug that ruins your production environment" and "I am not liable if I maliciously introduce a fatal bug knowin
327.
▲
by
rsstack
5y ago
This isn't like leftpad being deleted: he added an infinite-loop on purpose in a patch release to the package. This is a malicious attack. Only later did he delete packages.
328.
▲
by
rsstack
5y ago
He is mentally unstable. His motives are probably irrational. This is not the first time he reaches the news for strange criminal activities. (Yes, it's his code. No, it isn't legal to maliciously add an infinite-loop to a library
329.
▲
by
rsstack
5y ago
People here have been burnt by bad managers and it's honestly sad. If you have a personal relationship with your manager beyond emails and "how was your weekend", there's a good chance they will appreciate your longer no
330.
▲
by
rsstack
5y ago
Thank you, iamsaul, updated!
More ›