Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
roywiggins
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
31.
▲
by
roywiggins
3mo ago
Good news, airlines already barely profit: https://www.iata.org/en/pressroom/2025-releases/2025-12-09-0...
32.
▲
by
roywiggins
3mo ago
Even more worrying if it's not deliberate and we are all just naturally writing like that now.
33.
▲
by
roywiggins
3mo ago
Sometimes that's me. I wish more submissions didn't read like AI. I worry that people can't detect tiresomely LLMy output and upvote it to the front page. I'm not mad or anything, I just find the internet less and less u
34.
▲
by
roywiggins
3mo ago
My problem is that my personal AI detector running on wetware just goes ping and it's hard to articulate why. I agree with the person you're replying to on all points but also, when I think something is AI, it's very much jus
35.
▲
by
roywiggins
3mo ago
A shame that Pangram flags this as AI. https://www.pangram.com/history/c0a9cde2-7a5c-4588-83a3-0269...
36.
▲
by
roywiggins
3mo ago
ai; dr, unfortunately
37.
▲
by
roywiggins
3mo ago
Long sequences of short sentences. Not X, but Y. And Pangram flags it, too. https://www.pangram.com/history/126831e1-562f-4e65-9874-5250...
38.
▲
by
roywiggins
3mo ago
Weirdly not dissimilar from MUMPS systems.
39.
▲
by
roywiggins
3mo ago
ai; dr
40.
▲
by
roywiggins
3mo ago
Very likely. I'm just saying, people in the CIA seeing where the tech might be going and hedging their bets is not that unlikely.
41.
▲
by
roywiggins
3mo ago
Common side-effect of letting Claude write your landing page. Apparently it's mostly this: // ENCODE — pack(html) → one .hmml (a Uint8Array you store or send) // · lifts every data: image out of the HTML
42.
▲
by
roywiggins
3mo ago
Well, define "drone warfare"- the CIA and the Pentagon has been operating Predators and friends for a long while.
43.
▲
by
roywiggins
3mo ago
The idea is to expose it as a tool to your LLM agent so it can run calculations on its own initiative.
44.
▲
by
roywiggins
3mo ago
Your rewritten post is far easier for me to read now, fwiw. LLM output has conditioned in me a near reflex response to just close a tab as soon as I smell LLM-authored text. Like, I'm not mad or anything, I just frequently find most
45.
▲
by
roywiggins
3mo ago
"quietly" seems to be the new one recently
46.
▲
by
roywiggins
3mo ago
If something's a bad tool that misleads people into doing bad work, it would be good to know that.
47.
▲
by
roywiggins
3mo ago
> A simple distributional analysis of every rsync release with bug data. No model. No assumptions. Just placement. If you want me to read your analysis, you are going to have to make it not read like Claude wrote it. What does "plac
48.
▲
by
roywiggins
3mo ago
Pangram seems to be tuned to avoid false positives most of the time.
49.
▲
by
roywiggins
4mo ago
it can operate at the level of a mere mathematics professor, who everyone knows are barely conscious, basically automatons. wake me up when it's Einstein
50.
▲
by
roywiggins
4mo ago
Pangram flags this as 100% LLM output fwiw
51.
▲
by
roywiggins
4mo ago
It's that companies like copilot/cursor are in real trouble if they are in the business of reselling expensive Anthropic tokens
52.
▲
by
roywiggins
4mo ago
> “rename this function and update callers” I'm old enough to remember when IDEs could do this without needing a couple gigabytes of matrices to do it (LLMs are great for anything even slightly more complicated ofc)
53.
▲
by
roywiggins
4mo ago
Pangram agrees it's 100% LLM written.
54.
▲
by
roywiggins
4mo ago
pangram flags this whole post as 100% AI generated fwiw (and it reads that way to me)
55.
▲
by
roywiggins
4mo ago
They could have defended the small claims cases against them in that case?
56.
▲
by
roywiggins
4mo ago
It happens, eg: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EBay_stalking_scandal
57.
▲
by
roywiggins
4mo ago
Their first study allegedly resulted in "44% were below the cut-off for mild ASD"- ie, practically cured, from a diagnostic point of view.
58.
▲
by
roywiggins
4mo ago
imho part of the communication problem is that a 6 year reduction actually is large, but it doesn't sound large. Smoking takes about 10 years off your life, and it's deadly in a very mechanical and understood way.
59.
▲
by
roywiggins
4mo ago
No, that appears to be the implication of this study, which frankly seems like such a large effect that I'm pretty skeptical! I'd say "where's the control group" except the claimed effect is so large that you kind
60.
▲
by
roywiggins
4mo ago
“The past is a foreign country; they do things differently there.”
More ›