Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
randomdata
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
31.
▲
by
randomdata
2y ago
DNT does not provide informed consent. It may, if set to not track, imply denial, but the reverse is not true. If DNT is accepting or unset, the site needs to fall back to the banner to get consent. And at that point you may as well prompt
32.
▲
by
randomdata
2y ago
> Unless you think it's not possible to figure out problems and you can only do them by rote memorization? It is not possible to solve a problem from scratch. You must first invent the universe, as they say. Any solution you come
33.
▲
by
randomdata
2y ago
Or 1930s Great Depression no work for almost five years tough? I expect most people here won't have a good sense for 2009. While it wasn't great for many industries, for tech it was the "app" boom. You couldn't hard
34.
▲
by
randomdata
2y ago
> You can’t make $85 an hour playing with your computer as a gardener But if you step up to being a farmer then you'll be playing with way more interesting computers than you'll find on a typical desk. > (Although, appare
35.
▲
by
randomdata
2y ago
On the bright side, racist thoughts creeping into classes who haven't been exposed to circumstances that lead to racist thoughts before might become more understanding of and helpful towards those who have contended with them for ages
36.
▲
by
randomdata
2y ago
What are you offering in return?
37.
▲
by
randomdata
2y ago
In my experience you need a high quality codebase to be able to iterate at maximum speed. Any time someone, myself included, thought they could cut corners to speed up iteration, it ended up slowing things down dramatically in the end. Codi
38.
▲
by
randomdata
2y ago
Perhaps it is the reverse: That ColdFusion training sources are limited, so it is more likely to converge on a homogenization? While, causally, we usually think of a programming language as being one thing, but in reality a programming lang
39.
▲
by
randomdata
2y ago
I assumed you were already dead by the time I got to reading your response. One does not normally tell you that they are dying if they expect to still be around for a long time. Shame on me for assuming. What is the expected lifespan for so
40.
▲
by
randomdata
2y ago
> You cannot quantify it. You can, within some reasonable margin, quantify the opportunity cost, though, which is what such reparations are intended to compensate. Best I can find was that there were 15 plaintiffs, each representing a
41.
▲
by
randomdata
2y ago
RIP
42.
▲
by
randomdata
2y ago
Literally someone (or, at least, some thing) that can figure things out as problems arise? That seems quite generous. Unless you're solving a "problem" that has already been solved a million times before, it won't have a
43.
▲
by
randomdata
2y ago
> i did not know that one gender could be better at this work. that seems like huge news if true. There is research that has shown that men are, on average, better at single-focus tasks. And, indeed, it was huge news at the time the re
44.
▲
by
randomdata
2y ago
Right, but certain careers have figured out that women are, on average, better at the socialization game and thus, broadly speaking, a better fit for the job. Ain't nobody "diversity" hiring on the oil rigs or other jobs wher
45.
▲
by
randomdata
2y ago
There is an interesting dichotomy in your interview process. You say you want someone who can solve problems, but then go on to say (perhaps unintentionally; communication is hard) that you only want someone who has already rote-memorized h
46.
▲
by
randomdata
2y ago
Likely because it is not a good time to be a gardener (professionally) right now either. The tech job market and agriculture prosperity seem to track each other.
47.
▲
by
randomdata
2y ago
> Would you die if I make you hold a 1kg block of 10% pure uranium for an hour? Most people will answer yes. The real answer is no. I'm not sure where you got this mistaken idea that holding a block of uranium for an hour unlocks
48.
▲
by
randomdata
2y ago
> Not a single person reading this thread believes that you are a coolly detached rational observer All one of them? > Responding to an argument by not only pretending not to have an opinion The "argument" has only ever
49.
▲
by
randomdata
2y ago
Exactly what I want (or exactly what I don't want) is often a unique attribute of a home that is only available in the description. The higher level filters are a good way to narrow things down, but lacking in specific details. While y
50.
▲
by
randomdata
2y ago
20k-year-old cars were smaller than the ones we are accustomed to today.
51.
▲
by
randomdata
2y ago
But in that case you're just adding an additional descriptor to "intelligence". Like "fast car". In the same vein as the original question, what would justify a "FC" moniker? Nothing, of course. There is n
52.
▲
by
randomdata
2y ago
> The problem is that people who succeed in tech are able to effectively educate themselves Not by magic, though. Those who take an interest in tech are forced to learn how to educate themselves in order to fulfill their interest in te
53.
▲
by
randomdata
2y ago
> The problem is that people expect teachers adopt to every single pupil. Nah. The people expect EdTech to allow children to find their own suitable learning style with only babysitter oversight. But no teacher wants to "demote&qu
54.
▲
by
randomdata
2y ago
And variety of lecturers. Sometimes another person saying it changes everything.
55.
▲
by
randomdata
2y ago
Most developers using these kinds of tools these days are actually building their own database management systems, just outsourcing the persistence to another DMBS, so there isn't a strong imperative to think about good design so long
56.
▲
by
randomdata
2y ago
> That's highly debatable. Is it? You seem to stand pretty firm on your position (which is a fair one, for what it is worth).
57.
▲
by
randomdata
2y ago
> because workers didn't Do you mean immediately? At peak inflation wages weren't keeping pace, but wage growth is exceeding inflation right now to catch back up. Incomes have been, on average, stagnant for hundreds of years
58.
▲
by
randomdata
2y ago
Yes, we can. But should we?
59.
▲
by
randomdata
2y ago
You are welcome to answer it any way you see fit, but relaying a real world experience in code where you found those aforementioned attributes to be pressing would be a concise way to answer it. I suggested that to help, as you were clear
60.
▲
by
randomdata
2y ago
Because communication requires understanding, and arbitrarily making up a random context gives no understanding to what the other person is thinking? If I wanted to communicate with myself, I could simply write in my private journal. Is thi
More ›