Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
physicsguy
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
5 ms
·
31.
▲
by
physicsguy
3mo ago
I had that when workign with a lot of other Europeans. When I moved to a company where everyone was British I had to re-adapt, particularly because I'd become more direct after working with a lot of Germans.
32.
▲
by
physicsguy
3mo ago
The hydration breaks are a FIFA thing, we can't blame the US for that one. We're not really seeing the ads and half time crap and things as the international broadcasters don't show them.
33.
▲
by
physicsguy
3mo ago
Traditionally everyone had sash windows ("sliding windows") or casement windows ("swing open") made from wood. Nowadays sash windows are very expensive so almost everyone has casement windows, or even casement windows th
34.
▲
by
physicsguy
3mo ago
This might sound ridiculous to you but in the U.K. we generally don’t have tilting windows. They are really common in Germany though.
35.
▲
by
physicsguy
3mo ago
In the UK people predominantly use debit cards but credit cards are widely available. Everyone gets a debit card with any current account (i.e. non-savings account). In March this year there were 2.3 billion debit card transactions vs 400 m
36.
▲
by
physicsguy
3mo ago
I come to HN...
37.
▲
by
physicsguy
3mo ago
> Actually use a modern compiler This was always a pain point in C++ embedded space, to be fair.
38.
▲
by
physicsguy
3mo ago
I think most people didn't really care enough because if they knew C++ and they cared enough, they could still effectively contribute to the kernel.
39.
▲
by
physicsguy
3mo ago
That's not really true at all though, even in very complex software it's pretty rare to have more than ~10 external dependencies in a C++ project. People tend to roll their own a lot more, partly because dependency management is a
40.
▲
by
physicsguy
3mo ago
It's alright, just get ISO27001 and list them as risks!
41.
▲
by
physicsguy
3mo ago
> It provides legal stability compared to unpredictable arbitrary decisions by the US executive. I don't think assuming the European commission will act rationally or stably on this is really a good idea, and I say that as a Europea
42.
▲
by
physicsguy
3mo ago
I worked in very technical engineering software company and they were super paranoid about their special sauce IP of a product that did analysis of a certain type of data, without being able to see that all the pieces of that special sauce
43.
▲
by
physicsguy
3mo ago
> You can defensively set shipped binaries as fallbacks in the event the application is running on a newer system that dropped critical functionality Not if they're GPL licensed you can't. And that's a headache most commer
44.
▲
by
physicsguy
3mo ago
> If the author's vision of the future is correct, then competent software engineers are safe. Domain knowledge can be learnt much quicker than how to apply good engineering principles. I think this is true in some things and less t
45.
▲
by
physicsguy
3mo ago
I have had similar when trying it too. I couldn't even drive Claude Opus 4.7 to get PETsc to compile properly (with all the optional dependencies)
46.
▲
by
physicsguy
3mo ago
Of course but sometimes designers like architects design something that can’t easily be built.
47.
▲
by
physicsguy
3mo ago
Coding up a decent performing basic 3D finite element solver from scratch in C++. Still needed to know what I was doing but it’s a non trivial problem. I still couldn’t get it to do more advanced stuff.
48.
▲
by
physicsguy
4mo ago
It’s non trivial now - will it get easier in 12 months though?
49.
▲
by
physicsguy
4mo ago
If the bottom is falling out of the market in AI I think it's likely other things will fall too though.
50.
▲
by
physicsguy
4mo ago
I have found this with (mechanical) engineers. They know what they want to see but don’t understand the underlying details which are more mathematical than the average engineer is able to work with. So the people working on engineering soft
51.
▲
by
physicsguy
4mo ago
Depends on the task and the writing though doesn't it? There's not that much depth in a lot of 'everyday' writing. For many tasks that means that you don't need to be hyperintelligent - reading a recipe or a shoppin
52.
▲
by
physicsguy
4mo ago
My much larger company has got people already using various models through Bedrock because the Claude and OpenAI limits are too harsh and it's too expensive.
53.
▲
by
physicsguy
4mo ago
I think this is an age thing but I think young people getting into programming are dramatically underserved by not doing this. I think Claude/ChatGPT are great at getting answer to a specific question or set of questions and even goi
54.
▲
by
physicsguy
4mo ago
C APIs are much more annoying to wrap in Go than in Rust because of lack of enums (important) and unions (less important).
55.
▲
by
physicsguy
4mo ago
> Rust still rely on many C and C++ libraries Yes but Rust has a lot more availability of libraries to do stuff as a result. Want to do anything ML or scientific? You at least have a route in Rust where you don’t with Go.
56.
▲
by
physicsguy
4mo ago
About 12 years ago I went to go and work on some legacy C++ software when I was very green. We had a big code base and it had enum Bool { False = 0, True = 1 } everywhere. I thought it was a good idea to rationalise this since we had conver
57.
▲
by
physicsguy
4mo ago
Thanks for all your hard work! I already consider SciPy and NumPy to be best practice in this area but as I'm sure you know, it's the long tail of stuff built on top of these and other core packages that are really the issue!!
58.
▲
by
physicsguy
4mo ago
It's still better than it was 10 years ago (compiling everything from source wasn't uncommon even then!) but it's painful. Comparisons to other interpreted languages aren't really fair though, if JS/TS had as many c
59.
▲
by
physicsguy
4mo ago
`uv` is great but the biggest issue with Python packaging right now continues to be getting it right for scientific and ML packaging. Want to install PyTorch? which one? CUDA? Oh, OK, then you have to get the wheel directly from them becaus
60.
▲
by
physicsguy
4mo ago
Go is terrible for scientific/ML work though, the libraries just aren't there. The wrapping C API story is weak too even with LLMs to assist. Try and write a signal processing thing with filters, windowing, overlap, etc. - there&#
More ›