Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
paxcoder
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
91.
▲
by
paxcoder
10y ago
That's what I thought too, that's I say the word is missing.
92.
▲
by
paxcoder
10y ago
Not quite, I think the title should contain the word "machine".
93.
▲
by
paxcoder
10y ago
Ah, Parrot VM. Brings flashbacks of the dynamic typing bubble. No offense unitypers, maybe your typing systems have valid use-cases, I'm not sure. I'd like you to convince me if possible. EDIT: Using slightly less off-putting lang
94.
▲
by
paxcoder
10y ago
I'm sorry if I prematurely judged your effort, but you shouldn't expect people to read between the lines in a wall of text
95.
▲
by
paxcoder
10y ago
Google should have innovated or they should have complied. Instead they built on POSIX's shoulders and then diverged only enough to harm portability. Not cool.
96.
▲
by
paxcoder
10y ago
The one guarded by lizard people?
97.
▲
by
paxcoder
10y ago
I'm pro-hypertext, but this looks like web tech for web tech's sake. Their demo is literally an animated cursor. See TermKit for some more tought put into a graphically-enabled terminal: https://github.com/unconed&
98.
▲
by
paxcoder
10y ago
Maybe war on drugs opponents downvoted what they interpreted as sarcasm
99.
▲
by
paxcoder
10y ago
Good question. For networking, Kitura uses Kitura-net, which uses BlueSocket, which in turn uses C library's sockets[1]. On GNU/Linux, this is the GNU C Library, for which a package (Glibc) is provided by the Swift port[2]. For as
100.
▲
by
paxcoder
10y ago
No networking OR file system access in the free implementation. You'd be hard pressed to find a Swift project that doesn't depend on Apple's proprietary Foundation because Swift needs it to talk to the world! I don't und
101.
▲
by
paxcoder
10y ago
They should finish the free Foundation implementation[1] already which is the true standard library. Swift is not very useful without it, and they're talking about 4.0. It seems like Apple's giving their minimum to the community
102.
▲
by
paxcoder
10y ago
The issue is having to go through that other language. So your problem is JavaScript's monopoly, right?
103.
▲
by
paxcoder
10y ago
I'd like to bring up another thing for which this is relevant: https://github.com/golang/go/wiki/Mobile Here's hoping for cross-platform development without JavaScript.
104.
▲
by
paxcoder
10y ago
Under drinkjuice's reply to akmittal yes, that's the one comment I'm referring to. But one does not "so much" make.
105.
▲
by
paxcoder
10y ago
One hour after you've posted this comment, I went through every single comment in the thread and found 1 (one) negative comment about Opera. Considering that, wouldn't you say it's fair to say that your comment is bait?
106.
▲
by
paxcoder
10y ago
Nobody showed an interest, but I've found an article which covers all of what I wanted to cover and since it costs me very little to post it, here's the link: http://www.hanselman.com/blog/WhatNETDevelopersOug
107.
▲
by
paxcoder
10y ago
The first problem is that .NET Standard is not a specification in a traditional sense: "The official spec is a set of .cs files that define the APIs that are part of the standard." [0] If you're new to the .NET ecosystem and
108.
▲
by
paxcoder
10y ago
s/ sounds so seriously standardy: https://xkcd.com/927/
109.
▲
by
paxcoder
10y ago
Why wasn't Talos on the front page? Were you too busy seeing what's new in the world of locked-down gadgets, HN?
110.
▲
by
paxcoder
10y ago
Unfortunately __typeof__ is non-standard. Despite its usefulness it always gets left out of the standard (and with weird excuses, I think last time it was lack of implementations - despite the fact that eg. both GCC and LLVM implement it).
111.
▲
by
paxcoder
10y ago
With that description, I hope street cred
112.
▲
by
paxcoder
10y ago
That seems like a stretch to me, maybe expound on what you implied by "more".
113.
▲
by
paxcoder
10y ago
You're not telling me what is against the rules. What rules am I breaking by continuing to talk with you that you're not?
114.
▲
by
paxcoder
10y ago
Why do you think I should not "do this" on HN?
115.
▲
by
paxcoder
10y ago
I was meaning to ask you about that "here" from your original context. Because I suspect your "somewhere else" to be out of sight and out of mind.
116.
▲
by
paxcoder
10y ago
What does that mean? Surely that is not the site owner's history?
117.
▲
by
paxcoder
10y ago
I disagree that my comment was uncivil and without substance. My question is honest. My provocation is meant for the soul. I am sorry for not being kind.
118.
▲
by
paxcoder
10y ago
What, speaking my mind as a theist?
119.
▲
by
paxcoder
10y ago
Some people use the same logic to argue that homosexuality is implied by the biblical verse Luke 17:34 (also incorrectly interpreted as "rupture").
120.
▲
by
paxcoder
10y ago
The BBC article claims Croatia doesn't want the land because claiming it would validate Serbia's interpretation of the borders leaving Croatia with less land over all. I can't find the relevance of years 1974 and 1990 in the
More ›