opsiprogram

10 ms·

31.
by opsiprogram 9y ago
Why is it not suitable? It is more of a tech / philosophical question than a statement about the poster's politics...
32.
by opsiprogram 10y ago
lol what?
33.
by opsiprogram 10y ago
Okay so I completely disagree with this, so try harder to convince me! Let me bring to the front, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kirsten_Gillibrand . She's a democrat, but of course a good republican would work here
34.
by opsiprogram 10y ago
yea yea!
35.
by opsiprogram 10y ago
While I see the point, and I can agree with the points made that HN shouldn't be a "battlefield" for person opinion, I cannot accept that we will concede politics to be a topic to be too difficult for discussion, difficult co
36.
by opsiprogram 10y ago
Okay, so other news sources also can be biased/wrong/misrepresent science ... how does that make this Breitbart article more accurate? or Breitbart a more objective news source?
37.
by opsiprogram 10y ago
tomp maybe Breitbart got brought up for content like this: http://www.breitbart.com/tech/2015/12/08/birth-control-makes... It's mostly unsubstantiated claims, without scientific rigor to back them
38.
by opsiprogram 10y ago
Still, article could be correct, you're just taking this chance to let people know you don't approve of the NYTimes, not actually making an critique of the content itself....
39.
by opsiprogram 10y ago
haha kilroy, you can't say "No offense" and then proceed with "you don't know what the fuck you are talking about" obviously offense was intended, literally how could you express the idea that someone hasn&#x27
40.
by opsiprogram 10y ago
This article is almost a conspiracy itself! Haha I really went through it slowly, and unless I missed something...it really doesn't seem to read the government was repressing documents...more they just struggled to find all the emails.