onethought

6 ms·

31.
by onethought 1y ago
This technique is explicitly frowned upon in a number of licensing tests. Hand is required to be completely on throttle, or all four fingers completely on brake. So I'm not sure "completely irresponsible" is the right term, a
32.
by onethought 2y ago
What you are suggesting is basically unenforceable. How would you know what’s in a cameras frame? What do the police do with that register? That sounds like it’s just helpful for them. If it’s only a registration and not an approval process
33.
by onethought 2y ago
As others have pointed out, you are essentially advocating for non-enforcement of speed limits. Which feels an arbitrary line to draw. What about other road rules? Driving on the right side? Using unregistered vehicles? Countries like India
34.
by onethought 2y ago
GDPR just gives you the right to have it removed right? Curious to try that out, and request Amazon remove you from every ring recording .
35.
by onethought 2y ago
What is a licensed security camera? By this logic, are you saying cameras on private property, that happen to capture public space in their frame are also illegal?
36.
by onethought 2y ago
Said someone living in a comfortable country with a stable government. You can’t seriously believe this right?
37.
by onethought 2y ago
For private use you can film in public places in the Netherlands no?
38.
by onethought 2y ago
Which specific owner is the Chinese government?
39.
by onethought 2y ago
Sorry, I should have clarified my question further. They already broke their promises on Hong Kong. So I was asking what the other promises people think they won’t break? Like are we talking Taiwan? Or something in mainland China? Hence: wh
40.
by onethought 2y ago
Which promises do you mean? And which people?
41.
by onethought 2y ago
Isn’t this why solar is good. We already have the heat sink (earth) we just aren’t using the energy.
42.
by onethought 2y ago
I missed the citation on his education point. Has someone proved that “teaching to the test” leads to lower educational outcomes than not having tests?
43.
by onethought 2y ago
That’s right, the hill to die on is the browser’s openness. Not your OS, not your firmware. Not your hardware. It’s the browser
44.
by onethought 2y ago
Two distinct expressions that happen to share words. Is how I thought of it. Certainly in the context of the OP it seems he is not presenting an either or but a change course.
45.
by onethought 2y ago
Sometimes a metaphor doesn’t make sense so you might abandon it for another rather than trying to stretch it. Sometimes when fishing you catch something your rod or skill level is not capable of reeling in. So you are better to cut the line
46.
by onethought 2y ago
Perhaps micro wallets should be a thing where your wealth is distributed across many keys mitigating some loss.
47.
by onethought 2y ago
No it isn’t. No more than a wallet key. If I lose $1 note. It’s gone. If I recover it, then it’s no longer lost.
48.
by onethought 2y ago
Because we have power lines and batteries now, so solar can be where the sun is, and consumption can be where it isn't. I guess I'm envisioning a future where there is a lot more solar panels than there is consumption, meaning we
49.
by onethought 2y ago
But choosing nuclear power doesn't remove our need for semiconductors, so it's a bit weird to attribute that to solar. The fabrication of of panels is more analogous to fission material mining. As in you are procuring the material
50.
by onethought 2y ago
Right so pick a metric that highly favours nuclear because its been around longer. And ignore common sense that leaving inert rocks in the sun is fundamentally less dangerous than super heating water with highly toxic and unstable materials
51.
by onethought 2y ago
Is it? That's the thing we literally mass produce in factories. I think it's the machinery to do voltage conversions and transmission that is the critical cost factor.
52.
by onethought 2y ago
But there was only evidence of a reduction in temperature in your link. Which would actually increase the effectiveness of Solar. The idea of a global darkness for a significant period of time, would be extinction level.
53.
by onethought 2y ago
Radiation destroys DNA and directly causes cancer. That's the super obvious link. Your deliberate avoidance doesn't change that fact. Because of this are a bunch of safety protocols in the extraction, transportation, storage and u
54.
by onethought 2y ago
I think any project is going to need some form of capacitor as a grid would just become unstable if you dump a huge amount of peak solar onto it without the consumption. So either way you need batteries, and all the problems they bring. Jus
55.
by onethought 2y ago
Is there a link between Solar production and Cancer? I mean there is a super obvious one with Nuclear.
56.
by onethought 2y ago
It's not fair to point out very real impacts of Nuclear failures. But it's fair to compare to hypothetical-yet-to-occur "Mass Solar failures". Solar relies on Light, just like life does. So you are kind of referring to m
57.
by onethought 2y ago
There are batteries included as part of this project. So I don't think time really matters.
58.
by onethought 2y ago
Just go look up former prime minister Julia Gillard address US congress. I cringe every time I rewatch. (Then again thanks to Wikileaks we now know US were “assessing” whether Gillard would be a good replacement to Rudd a year before it all
59.
by onethought 2y ago
China has been rightly condemned for "speaking" of invading Taiwan. What would you like the world to do for this "thought crime" given no invasion has occurred? Surround the country in military bases? We've done tha
60.
by onethought 2y ago
Well, Alcohol is an even more easily accessible fuel that your body can readily use for a variety of activities... but its negatives are well understood...

More ›