Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
nithril
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
31.
▲
by
nithril
3y ago
I would be happier to pay a small fee per article I want to read. But the norm seems a monthly subscription.
32.
▲
by
nithril
3y ago
If it is on-prem, calling it "cloud" computer is imho misleading / marketing term.
33.
▲
by
nithril
3y ago
They do not primarily maintain free softwares, they primarily maintain softwares to better control their business models. And it is "free" because it does not impact their business models, on the contrary
34.
▲
by
nithril
3y ago
Is range really an issue if you can easily find charging spot and recharge in less than 15min?
35.
▲
by
nithril
3y ago
Not yet, it is still using GPT 3.5. The access to GitHub Copilot X (GPT-4) is in closed beta [1]. [1] https://github.com/features/preview/copilot-x
36.
▲
by
nithril
3y ago
There is as well that blog post introducing GraalOS [1] But still only providing marketing information. It sounds like they are interleaving GraalOS feature with the Oracle cloud feature, eg. for the "Run On Demand" and "Appl
37.
▲
by
nithril
3y ago
It is actually simpler to conceptualize the difference, one is stateless, the other one is stateful. Actually structured logging exists since years like in Java https://github.com/logfellow/logstash-logback-encoder
38.
▲
by
nithril
3y ago
From my experience, the challenge of a good review lies less on the how to convey but more on the capacity to set the cursor between a suggestion and an important remarks.
39.
▲
by
nithril
3y ago
Same finding. That's why that sentence in the article "but almost every technology company uses it." should be rephrased to "but almost every technology company do not need it"
40.
▲
by
nithril
3y ago
From a read perspective I would agree but from a write perspective if the partition is not available? (genuinely asking)
41.
▲
by
nithril
3y ago
> Why replicate data at the VM/disk level when those disks are already provided as a fully redundant system? Azure disk replications are for the durability of the data, not the avalability of the data from a kafka perspective.
42.
▲
by
nithril
3y ago
It is an improvement to better understand the glyphosate effects. Rational decision cannot be taken by only considering the glyphosate effects. Decisions have to be taken with an holistic view on the agricultural systems. Eg. glyphosate mig
43.
▲
by
nithril
4y ago
Still not comparable. Session cookie requires a session datastore server side. It then requires to enable sticky session, to replicate the session between the server or to have a distributed datastore. if user information are cached it will
44.
▲
by
nithril
4y ago
Still waiting for OVH or Scaleway to be really multi AZ (>2) with a network that cannot be cut by anyone...
45.
▲
by
nithril
4y ago
Might not be so obvious when summing all the cost (apex, opex). Not mentioning the difficulty to find experienced people to maintain it. Unless you are really big of course
46.
▲
by
nithril
4y ago
As long as the operator is really well designed but it is rarely the case. I switched from helm to bare k8s manifest for the same reason, helm/operator can be helpful, but not when the maintainer introduces breaking change (that does n
47.
▲
by
nithril
5y ago
On the contrary I wouldn't be surprised if the Russian defense industry is more effective (ratio result/spending) than the US one
48.
▲
by
nithril
5y ago
The benefit from an app running in a container and already listening to an HTTP port with on top an horizontal autoscaler looks small. I might miss something in the approach but as watchdog requires an "HTTP-level multiplexing for requ
49.
▲
by
nithril
5y ago
They do: less inputs mean that the farmer has to spend less time on the fields. Fertilizer isn't put in one shot. It is done multiple time over the year. Less means it will be done less times.
50.
▲
by
nithril
5y ago
The automatization is far from being the norm (if you mean autonomous tractor). Then automatization applies to both type of agriculture. But there how do I figure? Not sure to properly understand your question, because less works mean less
51.
▲
by
nithril
5y ago
It requires far more knowledge: an in depth understanding of the agriculture relating sciences. But less pesticides, less fertilizers, no-till certainly reduces the labor.
52.
▲
by
nithril
6y ago
This article sounds like a truism.
53.
▲
by
nithril
8y ago
Not true since g1gc
54.
▲
by
nithril
8y ago
which problem? There is no problem, especially since the latest gc. Only tradeof
55.
▲
by
nithril
9y ago
> MongoDB has identified a real pain point: many developers don't like to use SQL to interface with a transactional database. The pain point relates less to SQL but more to the RDBMS and the rigid schema. SQL is spreading and may be
56.
▲
by
nithril
10y ago
And the infosphere will become reality
57.
▲
by
nithril
14y ago
Remenber, your primary statement was : "Virtually all Groovy work involved Grails. There's no other reason to adopt Groovy." There are plenty other reasons to adopt Groovy, other than Grails Your other statement are opinion, not fact.
58.
▲
by
nithril
14y ago
Your statement is reductive. You can replace xtend by all the new jvm language. In fact these languages haven't proove anything. On the contrary of groovy. On my own experience I use groovy not only for grails : - virtually all java classes
59.
▲
by
nithril
14y ago
This is a great news. Groovy becomes more and more mature and efficient.
60.
▲
by
nithril
14y ago
As for scala.
More ›