newtonsmethod

5 ms·

31.
by newtonsmethod 1y ago
I think the common consensus is that the primary benefit of fluoride is topical, not systemic: * Initially, fluoride was considered beneficial when given systemically during tooth development, but later research has shown the importance and
32.
by newtonsmethod 1y ago
If we take the known harmful level of fluoride as being >1.5mg/L then the NTP monograph itself has some information (): > areas including central Australia, eastern Brazil, sub-Saharan Africa, the southern Arabian Peninsula, sout
33.
by newtonsmethod 2y ago
Just to note, the words "medium confidence" appear in neither the NTP monograph nor the taxonomy you referenced. They use the term "moderate confidence", which I guess has a similar meaning, but given the scale is from v
34.
by newtonsmethod 2y ago
Are you sure the estimates of the fluoride intake and fluoride consumed respectively are wildly incorrect in light of this? This isn't the best source of information but using data from here ( https://www.teausa.com/teau
35.
by newtonsmethod 2y ago
Do you have a reference for the claim that exposure to fluoride from natural dietary sources is far higher than what occurs from fluoridated water? An EPA review on fluoride exposure that I found ( https://www.epa.gov/sites&#
36.
by newtonsmethod 2y ago
While you are right that it is very rare that a water system will fluoridate their water to levels of 1.5 mg/L, I don't think it's true that all systems fluoridating their water have targets or achieve a level of 0.7mg/L