methodical

23 ms·

121.
by methodical 3y ago
I mean if they hypothetical company X has some tier that is extremely lenient with their limits and would likely end up cheaper than a pay-as-you-go model, I generally prefer going that route. That plus it also gives me some degree of certa
122.
by methodical 3y ago
Maybe I'm misunderstanding your comment but if you're under the presumption the Apple Developer membership is $100/ mo then I wanted to clarify it's actually $100/ yr for Apple Developer (it's actually 99 but
123.
by methodical 3y ago
I can't be the only person who noticed the double space in the first bullet point... Anyways, while I understand wanting to monetize their API instead of having it just be used by tons of people for free, the tiers here just seem like
124.
by methodical 3y ago
The bulk of your comment was just a strawman... Yes, interviewing a faceless "cartel" member with zero verification would be poor journalism, which isn't the same as bringing a camera into XYZ location and recording/desc
125.
by methodical 3y ago
Sorry, I should've specified that I was specifically talking about potential economic incentives for China. I am aware to a lesser degree that they wanted the land for alternate reasons.
126.
by methodical 3y ago
Want to point out that the global economic importance of Taiwan will decrease if TSMC is able to diversify away from Taiwan in any significant manner, meaning China stands to gain significantly less economically by invading Taiwan. Most of
127.
by methodical 3y ago
Not sure how many producers have the available long term supply to meet Apple's demand. Samsung might already have contractual obligations for their short term supply with other manufacturers so it might not quite be as straightforward
128.
by methodical 3y ago
I'd probably lean towards Apple making their own chips, it would definitely seem to be a logical continuation of Apple's agenda, and they are certainly among the few companies that have the capital to make it happen. They already
129.
by methodical 3y ago
I think a lot of people on here are for some reason believers in the idea that if a technology has detractors, then it must be another case of the steam engine, human flight, or some other technology that had doubters before completely revo
130.
by methodical 3y ago
Epic in complexity and setup time perhaps?
131.
by methodical 3y ago
Curious what alternative you believe is a better option for building applications in this day and age... Angular is basically dead and Vue abstracts too much (imo), unless you think vanilla JS is the way?
132.
by methodical 3y ago
It will never cease to amaze me how people can overcomplicate simple applications in such a fashion, particularly in JS land. I have never, and likely will never, understand the need for the addition of these bloated libraries on top of bar
133.
by methodical 3y ago
The difficulty with that is that trying to define "true understanding" crosses deeply into the philosophical realm. Moreover, a lack of ability to define a term does not invalidate my position. That being said, I'll instead p
134.
by methodical 3y ago
Not at all. Being able to give an example of something or spit something out that resembles a concept is not the same thing as understanding it, at least in my opinion. Keyword being true understanding, although I'll concede that it mi
135.
by methodical 3y ago
There's a distinct difference between asking somebody to write/copy/show a complex concept and understanding it. What I don't understand (get it?) is how people are still conflating LLM's behavior with true understa
136.
by methodical 3y ago
My position here is certainly debatable but IMO the pace of development in AI as a whole is actually pretty lackluster, and instead appears monumental because of the massive influx of VC dollars (and development of computing hardware!) whic
137.
by methodical 3y ago
Or maybe we've just moved onto the "next they laugh at you" part which will continue for a decade or so before any actually advancements in AI happen besides creation of larger matrixes of inputs to outputs, with equally poor
138.
by methodical 3y ago
I read that part, but I don't think trading off massive amounts of usability for the majority of people to slightly increase the usability for the minority is the right decision in almost any case.
139.
by methodical 3y ago
I don't understand this take at all. Why would you bury your navigation on your (hypothetical) marketing site in the footer on mobile? Most users don't even scroll far enough to make it to the footer and they certainly wouldn&#x27
140.
by methodical 3y ago
How exactly is his/her comment racist?
141.
by methodical 4y ago
Traditional google searches are a take it or leave it situation. The result depends on your interpretation of the sources google provides, and therefore, you are expecting a possibility of a source being misleading or inaccurate. On the oth
142.
by methodical 4y ago
I mean this is a bit of an apples to oranges comparison isn't it... On one hand, you're talking about how AI produces artwork from prompts, where you're expecting the output to be made up/fictional. And on the other hand
143.
by methodical 4y ago
Two QoL things I noticed within 1 minute of playing: please add backspace and start registering key presses as soon as someone starts typing! Having the text "type to start", and then my initial keypress being lost into the void w
144.
by methodical 4y ago
lol
145.
by methodical 4y ago
https://www.budgetable.io/ This feels like the 3rd budgeting application post on here lol, but here we go. A next-generation budgeting application, offering everything YNAB does, except at a lower price point, mobile applic
146.
by methodical 4y ago
> All lies. Doesn't bother to point out what part of it was a lie (because it isn't a lie) > Lies. Just write them down and store them securely. Welcome to the future of finance, make sure you don't lose your seed phras
147.
by methodical 4y ago
Almost like handwaving is the only way to disregard any of the real concerns people bring up about Bitcoin or crypto because there's not really any good way to dispel them with much logical proof.
148.
by methodical 4y ago
The difference of course between all of the rubbish that crypto/Bitcoin is (since they are, at the end of the day, in the same boat), is that by entrusting central parties to handle financial transactions in our traditional financial s
149.
by methodical 4y ago
And by using Bitcoin to automate all these transactions you get a bunch of very cool features such as constantly being at risk of losing your life savings due to phishing, scamming, hacking, etc., etc., etc. unless you store a hard wallet i
150.
by methodical 4y ago
Their spending has 10x'd since 2010, yet their traffic and scope remains relatively the same. This reeks of mismanagement and overspending. That being said, I more-so dislike their wording they use to gather the donations more than any

More ›