Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
libeclipse
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
211.
▲
by
libeclipse
9y ago
While true, I don't think that's related to the OP.
212.
▲
by
libeclipse
9y ago
Wait, that's the massive problem? Jesus. I'll stick with a VPN.
213.
▲
by
libeclipse
9y ago
> fixed mitigated
214.
▲
by
libeclipse
9y ago
What's wrong with VPN?
215.
▲
by
libeclipse
9y ago
The captive portal license agreement?
216.
▲
by
libeclipse
9y ago
It truly does sound horrid. Not sure why it's noteworthy. > Let's only use a single note. > But it might sound terrible. > Let's do it anyway.
217.
▲
by
libeclipse
9y ago
A better source than IFLS?
218.
▲
Happy Birthday Linux, here's your cake
(reddit.com)
1 points
by
libeclipse
9y ago
|
0 comments
219.
▲
by
libeclipse
9y ago
Can't this (or similar) be achieved on a run-time level so that binaries are reproducible? Don't know much about the topic so apologies for any wildly stupid comment.
220.
▲
by
libeclipse
9y ago
The author fails to acknowledge a scenario where you wouldn't care, or where you'd even actively want your source code to be public. For example, static websites for open source projects, et al.
221.
▲
by
libeclipse
9y ago
Not BLAKE2?
222.
▲
by
libeclipse
9y ago
1) How does the satellite come into this. 2) How does the C&C server complete the request. Are the hanging ports on the victim's side? 3) If the C&C server completes the connection, how do they carry on talking? Just like spoof
223.
▲
by
libeclipse
9y ago
Infected system sends packets to a decoy what? Satellite? And then the satellite forwards it.
224.
▲
by
libeclipse
9y ago
I don't understand how this works. The article doesn't go into much depth. They listen on data coming from a satellite for certain IPs, then connect to those IPs directly? How does that allow two-way communication?
225.
▲
by
libeclipse
9y ago
I can't bypass the paywall with Google. Any help?
226.
▲
by
libeclipse
9y ago
Y'all down-voting this but it's true. Of course McDonalds is in an excellent position to slowly give these symbols meaning through constant exposure, but inherently the way they're designed does not convey anything at all. Th
227.
▲
by
libeclipse
9y ago
It's fully a copycat, there's nothing else to call it. I mean I'm all for it, it was well-executed on Instagram. But past that was complete overkill. WhatsApp, really? I'm shown stories from everyone in my contact list,
228.
▲
by
libeclipse
9y ago
> While Saudi hydrocarbonism denies humanity to women, American hydrocarbonism denies credibility to climate scientists. Heh, nice word.
229.
▲
by
libeclipse
9y ago
Well if it's only strong in hardware then that means it's a poor choice for KD in software, as a potential attacker would have a significant advantage.
230.
▲
by
libeclipse
9y ago
I doubt this is more accurate than humans are, or is that possible? Wouldn't an AI that can be a judge in a Turing test be able to pass the Turing test? Or is this just testing how "real" the voice sounds?
231.
▲
by
libeclipse
9y ago
> a positive effect Any numbers/figures?
232.
▲
by
libeclipse
9y ago
Well my home internet isn't much better than that in the first place, so it's not a bottleneck. The same would likely hold for everyone on an ADSL connection.
233.
▲
by
libeclipse
9y ago
The person you're replying to didn't say that the citizens hated their homeland, he/she said that they preferred the older Somalia before it was state-less. I'm not choosing either side of this discussion, simply clearin
234.
▲
by
libeclipse
9y ago
That's an upside?
235.
▲
by
libeclipse
9y ago
You're absolutely right. When I saw this headline, I just thought, "yeah we know, is anyone surprised?" It shouldn't be like this, we should be outraged every time. I wonder if they planned it like this.
236.
▲
by
libeclipse
9y ago
That's not exactly what I said but---even if I did---I don't think that it's such a flawed line of reasoning. Do you mean to imply that if something exists, it is likely that it will never be used?
237.
▲
by
libeclipse
9y ago
Regardless of possible misuse, the technology (apparently) exists. We can't just ignore it and hope that it will go away. Besides, it has numerous benefits too. I feel like the argument against it is an example of the slippery slope fa
238.
▲
by
libeclipse
9y ago
This. But if the doctors really cared about it enough they could have simply refused to say anything, forwarding questions to the parents instead. But instead they made up an imaginary condition.
239.
▲
by
libeclipse
9y ago
If you want to make an impact, consider donating to The Open Rights Group: https://www.openrightsgroup.org/donate/
240.
▲
by
libeclipse
9y ago
What the actual fuck. This is legitimately worse than SOPA.
More ›