Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
kalcode
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
31.
▲
by
kalcode
6mo ago
Very neat, never thought about how different beaches are. Like the sites theme, easy to read as well.
32.
▲
by
kalcode
4y ago
> So based on the article's own observation: no, of course not. This had very little to the discussion. Of course it can't be replaced. Code is created by humans, and as long as we have opinions nothing gets truly replaced. Jus
33.
▲
by
kalcode
4y ago
I get it is a strange idea. But putting a quote that doesn't really have any substance isn't really an argument nor adding value against it. I think the idea of 4 days work week is asking to work outside the box for a moment on wh
34.
▲
by
kalcode
4y ago
The way that company has posted blog where they seem to have complete lack of understanding what graphql is and their comments on dev.to show a huge amount of disrespect. The blogs posts comments themselves shows the company's author o
35.
▲
by
kalcode
5y ago
That is more related to the frontend, the frontend doesn't have to overfetch data. But the graphql still will fetch that data and just filter what does out, it still has to get that data. Example is a query like ``` { currentUser {
36.
▲
by
kalcode
5y ago
> It's still like putting comments above your functions. If you're used to a certain language then sure that makes sense. Your comment seems like you are boxing yourself in, limiting yourself to just what makes sense in Javascr
37.
▲
by
kalcode
6y ago
> now that it has become evident that the brain is merely a kind of a computer I am ignorant in this area. But I keep reading how brains are nothing like computers the more we learn. Your statement seems to suggest otherwise and id love
38.
▲
by
kalcode
7y ago
Pretty important point for how far we should regulate something. I think the gaming community would want loot-boxes completely banned under the guise of "gambling". The individuals that would spend an unhealthy amount on these loo
39.
▲
by
kalcode
8y ago
>because now you're paying the bulk JS load cost of loading Redux Gonna have to quantify that. Cause I imagine if you did, you'd redact that statement. Redux is a very straightforwards and SMALL library that handles global stat
40.
▲
by
kalcode
8y ago
I don't think peoples complaints of YouTube are invalid at all. But I think it is interesting how much credit these people that monetize YouTube don't give google at all. Video hosting has always been expensive comparatively. They
41.
▲
by
kalcode
8y ago
Broken Age from start to finish took less than three years to make and went over-budget but still managed to complete the game by creating the two parts into chapters to get early sales outside the original kickstarters. People who have nev
42.
▲
by
kalcode
8y ago
Problem is when something crashes on Firefox it still tends to take everything with it. This is very annoying when developing something. Often when you have bad code as you are creating or changing things. So for developing I still prefer C
43.
▲
by
kalcode
8y ago
That isn't a very good argument. Just cause you downloaded something doesn't give you the rights to it. If that was the case piracy would be legal, software trails wouldn't be legal. Windows license or photoshop trial up? Wel
44.
▲
by
kalcode
8y ago
A language being compiled or not has nothing to do with the web being free. Like I said we can already pretty much transpile our code to practically speaking, an unreadable state. Companies can already choose to make their code closed sourc
45.
▲
by
kalcode
8y ago
This is a pretty ridiculous response. There have been compiled languages way before interpreter/jit ones and these didn't halt the advancement of programming and programming communities, especially the sharing code and ideas part.
46.
▲
by
kalcode
8y ago
> A lightweight & simple alternative to lodash/underscore Lodash full is 24kb. Mout is 450kb... Not light weight at all. The advantage is that its modular so your bundles would only include the libraries you require. Oh wait lod
47.
▲
by
kalcode
8y ago
That was the first library, Underscore or Lodash.
48.
▲
by
kalcode
8y ago
>no account verification required I keep hearing this but I made an account recently with no email verification. Recently as in one week ago. I put in a no email address actually. YOu can go sign up right now, leave the email field empty
49.
▲
by
kalcode
8y ago
> retina screens and the only usable touchpad in laptops I mean I don't have a side in this convo. But if you are gonna put up a argument at least make it not sound fanboyish. Plenty of laptops with similar ppi (what makes retina...
50.
▲
by
kalcode
8y ago
> This sort of mangling is disappointing from a tech-focused news outlet like The Verge. It also reinforces the implicit association between Kodi and piracy, which is the very thing that caused Google to remove Kodi from search results i
51.
▲
by
kalcode
8y ago
You only pay a price because you are using someone else system. Which cost money. Public library are public, you also pay taxes on them. Because using it as a service still has a cost. Google give you 1TB on data to query each month. That i
52.
▲
by
kalcode
8y ago
A public library still requires a library card... the term public means its available to the public. Signing up google, library card, doesn't negate that fact that any member of the public can access the data with a reasonable and insi
53.
▲
by
kalcode
8y ago
> I said that it is impossible for the source of that attitude to be a desire to get to what the cuisine was like before the discovery of America. I didn't gather that from your reply. I apologise for misunderstanding. I agree with
54.
▲
by
kalcode
8y ago
As someone from Texas I can definitely say from first hand the attitude I experience from people snubbing 'authenticity' in other cuisine is the same I hear towards 'Tex-Mex'. I have gone to many local restaurants where
55.
▲
by
kalcode
8y ago
People are always taken back about how much classic staples didn't exist prior to the discovery of America. On top of that realization is that the food wasn't adopted immediately. Meaning a lot of common dishes didn't exist u
56.
▲
by
kalcode
9y ago
They hit you with 'Chargeback fraud'. They can cancel your card, put it on your credit history redcord and can choose to press charges.
57.
▲
by
kalcode
9y ago
Yes their implementation seems to be overly aggressive. To me if you are saving more money by having this than not, why make it so aggressive? Better to catch the few then catch customers that aren't taking advantage of it and not catc
58.
▲
by
kalcode
9y ago
>If you stop accepting returns They are trying to stop people who abuse the policies, not returns altogether. The article never says the retailers are making a move to stop returns from everyone. That kinda defeats the point you are tryi
59.
▲
by
kalcode
9y ago
Well if you do and you constantly do chargebacks then you will get hit with fraud from your credit card company.
60.
▲
by
kalcode
9y ago
In a truly free-market who would enforce this 'transparency'? That is the whole point against it, no one would enforce it. You say the people would but would they? Would they care? People in the US know about 'blood' dia
More ›