jddj

6 ms·

31.
by jddj 3mo ago
The greed index is off the frickin' charts right now across the board, that's why
32.
by jddj 3mo ago
...and are all now on 200k, right?
33.
by jddj 3mo ago
On the contrary. There are many benchmarks, some small subset of which are intended to reflect the whole market. There are indices for every little thematic and niche corner or strategy or idea, there are broad-as-possible indices, and ther
34.
by jddj 3mo ago
Maybe you know this already, but this reads like exactly the kind of reasoning that people looking back at irrational market euphorias point to as a sign things were about to go awry.
35.
by jddj 4mo ago
All of this noise and velocity will provide significant cover for the Jia Tans of the world.
36.
by jddj 4mo ago
> OpenAI are very keen to suggest it's legally equivalent to a human when it suits them When is/was that? (Not rhetorical)
37.
by jddj 4mo ago
Index funds buy companies, for the most part, according to their market capitalisation. They own more of bigger companies than small. There's the option of "equal weight" or other strategies but the overwhelming majority is m
38.
by jddj 4mo ago
Presumably there is some time component, i.e you need to use the machine quickly or risk losing it. Also, it's better to double $2 instead of $1, and then pay back that $1.1 and end up with $2.9 instead of $2. But it was a more facetio
39.
by jddj 4mo ago
If you have a machine that reliably takes $1 and makes $2 you raise debt not equity
40.
by jddj 4mo ago
At one point (1.5 months ago) Bloomberg posted a piece saying the private market was apparently drying up for openai due to anthropic sucking all the oxygen out of the room. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/
41.
by jddj 4mo ago
Is that the case? What about gpt 4.5? o1-pro?
42.
by jddj 4mo ago
A little too much Michael Bay
43.
by jddj 4mo ago
Jonestown, right? Recordings from Jamestown would be quite a big deal.
44.
by jddj 4mo ago
Claude the other day wrote code where one of the bytes in the array was 0xO5. That's zero ex oh (the letter) five
45.
by jddj 5mo ago
Language nit: in english, "add to that" is more natural
46.
by jddj 5mo ago
For the most part I think we get the benchmarks we deserve. Many SWE-bench passing PRs would not be merged: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47341645 Top model SWE bench scores may be skewed by git history leaks: https
47.
by jddj 5mo ago
Getting to that point is likely going to involve a lot of (the business and personal equivalent of) Teslas electing to drive through white semitrailers.
48.
by jddj 5mo ago
Once you've seen a few results of an LLM given too much sway over product decisions, 5 effort modes expressed as various english adjectives is pretty much par for the course
49.
by jddj 5mo ago
Looking at the account's other comment there are subtle grammatical errors in that one too. Would be good to see the prompt out of morbid curiosity
50.
by jddj 5mo ago
What throws me about this comment is the missing space between the period and the T in the last sentence. Did the model itself do that? Was it a paste error?
51.
by jddj 5mo ago
Is your premise here that LLMs have a unique or enhanced insight into how LLMs work best?
52.
by jddj 5mo ago
What if it impairs judgement?
53.
by jddj 5mo ago
People thought grand theft auto would do it, but in the end it was twitter and facebook.
54.
by jddj 6mo ago
How many days' fuel does Taiwan keep in reserve outside of this type of situation?
55.
by jddj 6mo ago
Leaving aside the sloppiness of the article, I think a lot of the behaviour in recent memory around crypto and meme stocks, and to an extent the whole rotating bubbles mode that markets seem to be in, can be attributed to this general trend
56.
by jddj 6mo ago
Is that what you wanted, or was more some kind of edgy / controversial "all publicity is good publicity" thing? All of it comes across as intentionally obnoxious. It's an AI wrapper, the only substantial thing you added
57.
by jddj 7mo ago
The dead internet arrived slowly, then all at once
58.
by jddj 7mo ago
And despite all of that this is an LLM comment, right?
59.
by jddj 7mo ago
The venn diagram for "bad things an LLM could decide are a good idea" and "things you'll think to check that it tests for" has very little overlap. The first circle includes, roughly, every possible action. And the
60.
by jddj 7mo ago
(It'd be for selling to them, not for hiring them)

More ›