implicit

7 ms·

91.
by implicit 13y ago
Discipline is great, but it's finite and has to come not just from you, but from everyone else on your team as well. The compiler remains vigilant and uncompromising forever. It's best to automate everything you can, and ask your
92.
by implicit 13y ago
I'm having fantastic success with a custom IO-like monad that lets me statically verify that my unit test suite is totally side effect free. I don't have to resort to documentation or code reviews to ensure that my teammates write
93.
by implicit 13y ago
I've been working with engineers writing production Haskell for the first time; its lack of a "null" concept is proving to be absolutely incredible. In a high-uptime production environment, it's at least as valuable as Haskell's enshrineme
94.
by implicit 14y ago
If your team has more than one person in it, you have two choices for indentation: You can use spaces only, or you can have a random invisible mish-mash of tabs and spaces. Nobody EVER gets it right, and if you're coding in something whites
95.
by implicit 15y ago
Absolutely. Think about it this way: "4x slower than native code" means that 80% of the CPU's cycles are being spent on the platform. With NaCl, it becomes possible to instead spend most of those cycles on extra application richness without
96.
by implicit 15y ago
Implicit conversions come to mind. They don't need to interact with anything to be confusing. Consider this program: #include <iostream> using std::cout; using std::endl; struct C { int x; C(int _
97.
by implicit 16y ago
This could be really great for GCC if they pick the right subset. For instance, I could imagine that a GCC that takes advantage of namespaces, overloaded functions, and template functions (notably: not classes, exceptions, or implicit type
98.
Reporting Crashes in IMVU: Who threw that C++ exception?(aegisknight.org)
22 points by implicit 17y ago|4 comments