Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
hyperbrainer
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
5 ms
·
61.
▲
by
hyperbrainer
1y ago
Tcl is another language used in the domain; it is rarely used outside of some sectors, but lots of interfaces for embedded systems are written in Tcl, especially in the Electical/Computer/Electronics Engineering sector. IMO, the i
62.
▲
by
hyperbrainer
1y ago
SDL does have a platform-agnostic render library for basic stuff, and you can integrate Metal into it pretty easily.
63.
▲
by
hyperbrainer
1y ago
Needs (2018)
64.
▲
by
hyperbrainer
1y ago
If only there was an editor which could act as an interpreter for Lisp directly ...
65.
▲
by
hyperbrainer
1y ago
Any sufficiently complicated piece of code contains an ad-hoc implementation of Lisp.
66.
▲
JSON Hijacking (2009)
(haacked.com)
2 points
by
hyperbrainer
1y ago
|
0 comments
67.
▲
by
hyperbrainer
1y ago
Oh, I didn't see the typo. Thanks!
68.
▲
My Book's Pre-Sale Just Barely Succeeded
(mtlynch.io)
19 points
by
hyperbrainer
1y ago
|
7 comments
69.
▲
by
hyperbrainer
1y ago
For some reason the silverbullet link in the website is broken if I copy it or just click it. But typing the exact same thing works.
70.
▲
by
hyperbrainer
1y ago
I know of these. Almost added a disclaimer too -- that was not my point, as I am sure, you understand. Also Ocaml has a GC, unsuitable for many applications common to systems programming.
71.
▲
by
hyperbrainer
1y ago
> Both have the big restriction that the two functions involved are required to have the same signature. I did not know that! But I am a bit confused, since I don't really program in either language. Where exactly in the documentati
72.
▲
by
hyperbrainer
1y ago
I couldn't actually figure out whether this TCO being done "fairly well" was a guarantee or simply like Rust (I am referring to the native support of the language, not what crates allow)
73.
▲
by
hyperbrainer
1y ago
It's interesting especially because it seems like companies today pour tens of millions into "accessibility", but I never see a thing's usability in terms of simple and easy-to-do-what-I-want UX fall in to the same categ
74.
▲
by
hyperbrainer
1y ago
AFAIK Zig is the only somewhat-big and known low-level language with TCO. Obviously, Haskell/Ocaml and the like support and it are decently fast too, but system programming languages they are not.
75.
▲
Tail Call Recursion in Java with ASM (2023)
(unlinkedlist.org)
96 points
by
hyperbrainer
1y ago
|
48 comments
76.
▲
by
hyperbrainer
1y ago
Actually, you are right.
77.
▲
by
hyperbrainer
1y ago
Any language with decent TCO won't do that. Python is the only big language that I can think of that doesn't do it.
78.
▲
by
hyperbrainer
1y ago
> > A recursive algorithm is a depth first search. Any loop that explores candidates/neighbors without sorting the candidates is a BFS. BFS is also a recursive search. Even in the case of non-recursive search, the only difference
79.
▲
by
hyperbrainer
1y ago
This is great!
80.
▲
by
hyperbrainer
1y ago
I think there is a difference between comparing strings and so on, versus actually semantically processing the text. Spam/Phishing detection already feels invasive to me (although there is no way I would leave that to most users), and
81.
▲
by
hyperbrainer
1y ago
> Gmail is rolling out a smarter search feature powered by AI to show you the most relevant results, faster. Meaning they will actively be parsing emails and indexing them.
82.
▲
Gmail's upgraded search results help you find the emails you want, faster
(blog.google)
10 points
by
hyperbrainer
1y ago
|
6 comments
83.
▲
by
hyperbrainer
2y ago
Perhaps not. On closer inspection, the inverted pyramid reference does seem to support the claim anyways. Sorry! I really need to read better.
84.
▲
by
hyperbrainer
2y ago
I still think that your argument of "conveying most important information first" is really something that should be tackled through the title, but I agree with the rest.
85.
▲
by
hyperbrainer
2y ago
> communicate the effect of the change as quickly as possible This should happen in the title of the PR overall. In larger projects, a single commit is rarely pushed alone. Personally, I use it as a checkpoint to save progress rather tha
86.
▲
by
hyperbrainer
2y ago
What really should happen is use of a simple structure with bullet points. ===== Error: Result of Investigation/Actual Problem: Solution:
87.
▲
by
hyperbrainer
2y ago
What I don't understand is how you get to a valuation of $32B. My quick googling showed me that the revenue for Wiz is about $700M. Even if I assume the existing customers + name + platform/assets is worth several billion, where i
88.
▲
by
hyperbrainer
2y ago
I definitely did not consider this earlier. Do you know of some other big examples where monetary loss was actually a win when considered in an overall context?
89.
▲
by
hyperbrainer
2y ago
But Ravenholm loses some of its scare-factor due to that.
90.
▲
by
hyperbrainer
2y ago
You need RT-capable cards and minimum 3060Ti or equivalent.
More ›