geraldyo

6 ms·

31.
by geraldyo 4y ago
You need to follow through your logic... > if there's a reasonable valid reason Who says it's a valid reason? Who says the reason is what they say it is? Who decides the best fix would be to censor a transaction? What if FakeBl
32.
by geraldyo 4y ago
Where'd you get that number from? That's pretty interesting
33.
by geraldyo 4y ago
"it hasn't been done before, so it can't be done now". 25 years ago isn't 14 years ago isn't now...
34.
by geraldyo 4y ago
I for sure agree, I accidentally made it seem I was defending Facebook or Social Media in general. I think I meant it's also not accurate to say Fox News DOESN'T do that. But fair points!
35.
by geraldyo 4y ago
Yep, cause Fox News makes no money giving crazies a place to congregate lol. MyPillowMan TM sends his regards, brother
36.
by geraldyo 4y ago
Here's one example: https://www.denverpost.com/2012/12/17/archaeologists-find-pr... https://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/18/science/ancient-bones-tha...
37.
by geraldyo 4y ago
Do you think they wouldn't be able to keep you inside a house?
38.
by geraldyo 4y ago
There's a few examples on how it is centralized, not sure what you were looking for?
39.
by geraldyo 5y ago
It's absurd to me how OK everyone is with the fact that you're heavily implying that "the LGBT" or "women right" (sic) is in some way responsible. Greed, lack of sight and poor management are all at fault, as y
40.
by geraldyo 5y ago
The point is that you get more excited by that, but I personally would never use that app lol
41.
by geraldyo 5y ago
Have you not seen any examples in history of "civilian freedom fighters" (there's an Arabic word for that, I think.........) getting a lot over an "experienced military"?
42.
by geraldyo 5y ago
lol dem chinese comin for ya brother
43.
by geraldyo 5y ago
I think this is referencing Alencar, another character in Os Maias. Queiros calls him that only 5 or 6 times during the book, If I remember correctly he uses it as a callout for something, but I can't remember what. Wonder what "p
44.
by geraldyo 5y ago
This seems to be arguing for more mentorship time. > Every successful remote team still needs to master semi-regular synchronous meetings to combat the “island” effect. No matter how shy or introverted an employee may be, you, as a leade
45.
by geraldyo 5y ago
Super interesting, and that's what I wonder: is this type of event happening because of something we haven't even thought of measuring (at least at scale)? No idea, obviously. Thanks for the link
46.
by geraldyo 5y ago
Good to know, thanks!
47.
by geraldyo 5y ago
Is this whole thing at all related to climate change? I know nothing about that field, just seems interesting timing of "once-in-a-lifetime" events
48.
by geraldyo 5y ago
And what is your point exactly? COVID can kill an individual thousands of times faster than they can shed their other comorbities. So then what? In an ideal world, the government would have focused on health YEARS ago, but that's not r
49.
by geraldyo 5y ago
Wait, isn't this very page you linked them "disclosing it transparently to the user"? Or are you talking about the content of it not being transparent enough for you?
50.
by geraldyo 5y ago
Can you explain how?
51.
by geraldyo 5y ago
+1 here, we've been using Gunicorn in production for ~2 years now, once it was set-up I never had to think about it
52.
by geraldyo 5y ago
We're currently making an effort to restructure our databases so that we can accommodate mononyms. Nice to see at least one person might find that cool lol
53.
by geraldyo 5y ago
Forgot to address your point about the imposed isolation: this is a response to the person's individual liberty to choose not to get the vaccine. Yes, you have the freedom to choose to be unvaccinated, but you have to deal with the con
54.
by geraldyo 5y ago
Yes, I agree that these costs all exist. What were those same costs where countries kept open measures, on top of the resulting deaths? I honestly can't even find that information, but it seems that it's not being factored in most
55.
by geraldyo 5y ago
I got the math wrong, more like 400, but still: yes, the group is at significantly lower risk of death. What would you say is a valid explanation of "let's make things more open" to the people close to those young adults who
56.
by geraldyo 5y ago
2. How would we possibly know? The fact is in the short term, open measures are not working. Can you expand on the immense economic and human costs? Are you accounting for the economic and human impact from the millions of deaths from faile
57.
by geraldyo 5y ago
It's interesting how all articles against measures to stop the spread of COVID-19 seem to ignore/gloss over: 1. What would the statistics be without any measures? We saw what happened... everywhere... That chose to go "herd i
58.
by geraldyo 5y ago
Public perception is always part of big budget projects like this. They are most likely releasing some outstanding "enhanced" visually interesting images
59.
by geraldyo 5y ago
Because the "argument" has a limited view, namely that individual liberty is the ultimate goal/blessing/benefit. A blanket "all banning is bad" is just wrong. Saying "are you gonna arrest me from doing mat
60.
by geraldyo 5y ago
Look into the city of São Paulo, Brazil, before and after banning billboard ads before drawing an example from the USSR

More ›